It's over. Feds used Dennis Montgomery's technology to hijack the election.
(media.greatawakening.win)
💥 B O O O O O M 💥
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (176)
sorted by:
Saucey sauce?
Maybe I'm missing something - I'm not looking at the Lindell event and have no knowledge of where this comes from.
From a text analysis viewpoint, this text reads likes its been written by a highschool dropout who never learned to use English technically or professionally. If it is legit (and everyone else commenting knows where it's from) then all I can say is, this guy cannot write for the life of him.
Without knowsing sauce or context, and having only the text itself, I'd say it would be virtually impossible for a professional with any moderate level of expertise or education (such as who might actually work on such programs) to write this way.
"....and discussed ..... domestic surveillance programs I worked in including election tampering and the abuses of .... who directed and supervised this illegal domestic surveillance programs I worked in, first in ...
<facepalm>
and discussed ..... domestic surveillance programs I worked ON including election tampering and abuses COMMITTED BY .... who directed and supervised THOSE programs.
"this programs"? ROFL.
"I presented information to him to support the claims I was making in my previous whistleblower complaints. I was seeking immunity to allow me to present my evidence of these super-secret surveillance programs I worked in."
I presented him with information in support of the claims I had made in previous whistleblower complaints.
super-secret? Not super-dooper-secret?
"....programs I worked in" is written (or spoken) FOUR times: completely redundant!!!
"us gov"? Not US gov?
If this is evidence verified and presented, then it only means the author cannot write shit or talk in any sort of professional capacity. But on its own, this level of crap writing would be powerful circumstantial evidence that it's all bulldust, written by a larper or fraud.
If anyone can verify or indicate sauce... please do!
I spent the past two days listening to buffering audio of most of the event. Now the vids are broken up into smaller pieces with each speaker.
As I listen for the next few days, I will see if I can find this specific speaker & get the link out.
For now they have the Terabytes of data that anyone can download & review (granted it sounds like only cyber security experts will know what to look for outside of what we were all told specifically about).
The call to action is to get the Cast Vote Records from your county clerk & then get those to your Sheriff letting them know that they can compare it against the data that Lindell has to prove fraud in your county. That will allow your sheriff to seize the voting machines this year & force a hand count in every county where the Sheriffs will do their jobs.
Many Sheriffs are already on board & will teach other Sheriffs how to find the fraud once we get it to them. Sorry, way too much hopium for sure, so take that for what it is worth.
https://greatawakening.win/p/15JAv6gyge/call-to-action-get-your-cast-vot/
Thanks Honest. This really seems like an awesome development in the slow burn of the Swamp that 2022 is. And amazing preparations for the upcoming elections.
It should be noted, I'm not suggesting or implying there is anything illegitimate about the Lindell event. I'm just wondering where this snapshot of text came from, who the source is purported to be, and I'm pointing out that the text itself raises a bunch of questions about any author.
Dennis Montgomery's Sworn Declaration: https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ud7di43b2mdH/
Hopefully some anon will remember pretty closely where it was & get the link to you faster that I end up doing it.
No Rush.
Was it something presented at the Lindell event? Was it show in a live feed?
I'm just wondering what the context is. The OP gave zero context or sauce. :(
I was not able to watch Saturday but did devote myself yesterday. I think OMG came out of my mouth more than once!
Some fantastic info there. Definitely had many filled with hopium beyond historical precedent :D
I read it and understand it just fine.
Oh, I understand it no problem.
I'm a linguist and a trained text analyst. I'm just looking at the text through that professional knowledge. Text analysis involves examining texts, analysing them to extract information about who, what, when, how, etc. It's a science-type subject, built on linguistic research.
All I'm saying is that the text itself is totally incongruous with the idea that the author is a professional, an engineer, or technically expert person. And, that opinion is not simply a layman's opinion, fwiw.
There was way much more presented during the presentation. It was really good, you should watch it.
Sure.
But WHERE is the OP's content from? Simple question, isn't it?
No offense.
English text Nazis over think communication and grammar. I make tons of typos. It doesn’t mean anything.
No offense at all. Coz I'm 100% absolutely not a grammar nazi. I have learned, studied, and taught language in a wide variety of contexts, and I understand it on a level that essentially 95% of people who haven't studied language as a science don't.
No more than passengers on a jet understand and can operate or grasp everything involved in actually flying a jet, or building one.
But, you're wrong about communication. Grammar nazis generally do not understand the significance or place of communication in the language systems.
Also, just because your typos don't mean anything to you, doesn't mean they don't mean anything. They do. But very possibly they don't negatively impact your ability to communicate in a wide variety of contexts, including an internet forum board.
But if you were a lawyer, or a serious biological scientist, or an engineer, your typos very well could have a significant impact.
Context is EVERYTHING.
Cheers.
It's an excerpt from a declaration made by Dennis Montgomery that was presented by Lindell's lawyer last night at Mike Lindell's event. Sworn under oath. I'm sure the whole segment will be up on Frank Speech before too long. Everyone will be able to see it for themselves. (Edit: https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ud7di43b2mdH/
Not sure of the timing. If the Declaration was done after Montgomery's massive stroke that could account for it not being perfect. The man had to re-learn basic things.
Awesome. I'm surprised at the quality of the language used (poor) but it may well be a transcription of a verbal testimony, or the speaker (Montgomery) may just talk/write like that.
I'm curious to here the man speak, now.
Great. Thanks. Saucey sauce makes all the best dishes taste delicious.
Get over yourself.
hahahaha. Name checks out!
But ok, I'll get over the 7 years of tertiary-level studies and decades of training and experience in linguistics and text analysis that I have. Sorry I dared to speak up. Can you recommend a cave you think i should crawl back into, oh Wonderous One?
But maybe I'm not the one who needs to get over themselves...
Here: maybe this might help you to help me to get over myself?
https://www.scientific-editing.info/blog/what-is-textual-analysis/
As someone who is bad@grammar, I would like to sincerely thank you for being a fearless, and outspoken word-fag. I truly appreciate it. It's a shame that your kind gets treated so unfairly on the internet. Don't stop being you, fren.
Thanks Toxic. Thanks for the encouraging words, fren.
Perhaps some pedes are unable to distinguish between being a grammarnazee on one hand, and being a language analyst on the other.
There's nothing really wrong with being bad at grammar. Ultimately, the question is, am I able to articulate and communicate my thoughts, ideas, emotions, intentions, effectively. If that's accomplished, bad grammar, etc, linguistic 'rules', are not that relevant.
However, HOW a person uses language and what kind of dialects, habits, grammar, etc they use does reveal information that can be used to good effect, both to (sometimes) help improve effectiveness of communication, or, as in this case, to identify questions about the author.
The text here reads like some larp on 4chan wrote this up. That's all I'm saying. So, without ANY sauce reference or context provided by the OP, I'm wondering what's going on here.
Edit: I frequently enter typos when posting on GAW. Heaps.
Thanks for proving my statement.
You're welcome. Anything I can do to help your self-esteem.
All you really need to do is watch the last few hours of the program. He had all this information about Dennis Montgomery and then the Sheriffs right before the summit ended.