I fully support any and all studies to mitigate vaxx injuries. The only comment I made is that this does not stand up to logic, and, therefore, at the very least, is premature.
I have a unique understanding of all this, because I, myself, suffer from autoimmune conditions resulting from formaldehyde poisoning. I know what proper immune response is, and also how autoimmune conditions RARELY resolve, and usually get worse over time. I am daily trying to manage my own autoimmune issues, and I know there are few good answers.
From the pdf: "It is important to emphasize that there are no published reports detailing the management of vaccine injured patients." The document is a good summary of the problem, modes of action, etc., but be wary of making the assumption because it contains a lot of content, that the words themselves somehow add to the veracity. The references are not studies on the protocol, only source material for what is discussed in the pdf.
I need to say one more thing about autoimmune issues. There are a lot of postulations in the pdf/protocol, which amount to not much more than guesswork. The reason I am MOST suspicious of this "protocol" is that there is no recognition (of what I can see), that those suffering from autoimmune conditions are HYPER-REACTIVE to much of what is suggested. A researcher should know this, and should be at the top of the list of assumptions. I know about the hyper-reactivity from personal experience. The herbals suggested tend to UP-regulate the immune system, not down-regulate. Also, quite a few people can not tolerate high doses of Vitamin C. When it is derived from rose-hips, as most supplements are, it causes kidney stones.
Again, I'm not trying to be argumentative. The link to the pdf appears frequently on this board, and all I'm doing is providing some counterpoint. I'm glad there are people working on this. But it is becoming apparent that the worst symptoms from the vaxx are not from the spike proteins at all, but the strange and untreatable clotting.
I fully support any and all studies to mitigate vaxx injuries. The only comment I made is that this does not stand up to logic, and, therefore, at the very least, is premature.
I have a unique understanding of all this, because I, myself, suffer from autoimmune conditions resulting from formaldehyde poisoning. I know what proper immune response is, and also how autoimmune conditions RARELY resolve, and usually get worse over time. I am daily trying to manage my own autoimmune issues, and I know there are few good answers.
From the pdf: "It is important to emphasize that there are no published reports detailing the management of vaccine injured patients." The document is a good summary of the problem, modes of action, etc., but be wary of making the assumption because it contains a lot of content, that the words themselves somehow add to the veracity. The references are not studies on the protocol, only source material for what is discussed in the pdf.
I need to say one more thing about autoimmune issues. There are a lot of postulations in the pdf/protocol, which amount to not much more than guesswork. The reason I am MOST suspicious of this "protocol" is that there is no recognition (of what I can see), that those suffering from autoimmune conditions are HYPER-REACTIVE to much of what is suggested. A researcher should know this, and should be at the top of the list of assumptions. I know about the hyper-reactivity from personal experience. The herbals suggested tend to UP-regulate the immune system, not down-regulate. Also, quite a few people can not tolerate high doses of Vitamin C. When it is derived from rose-hips, as most supplements are, it causes kidney stones.
Again, I'm not trying to be argumentative. The link to the pdf appears frequently on this board, and all I'm doing is providing some counterpoint. I'm glad there are people working on this. But it is becoming apparent that the worst symptoms from the vaxx are not from the spike proteins at all, but the strange and untreatable clotting.