House Of Cards Parallels to 2016 and 2020 Elections - The Great Awakening

The bright new SLS rocket stands taller than the Statue of Liberty, at 23 stories, with the spaceship secured up top. Four car-sized engines and two rocket boosters should give it enough thrust to push through the thickest parts of the atmosphere. If everything goes smoothly, Orion will clock a total distance of approximately 1.3 million miles over 42 days. It will zip as close as 60 miles above the lunar surface, allowing lunar gravity to sling it 40,000 miles past the moon before heading back to Earth for a splashdown in the Pacific Ocean in October.

It will... splash down in October?

Fed Chair Powel warns of "pain" coming soon.

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/08/26/powell-warns-of-some-pain-ahead-as-fed-fights-to-lower-inflation.html

permalink save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– LoneWulf 1 point 2 years ago +2 / -1

Something is really off here. 42 days?!? Of course for 1.3 million miles, that's still impressive, but what about the manned flights:

"It took 76 hours to reach the lunar orbit from Earth in 1969. Apollo 11 traveled 240,000 miles to reach the moon. In fact, it is quite a short time considering that even today the journey to the Moon would take about 3 days.

If you set out on a journey to the moon when the moon is closest to the earth you will have to pass 360,000 kilometers. If you set off when the moon is furthest away, there are 405,000 kilometers ahead of you. The distance to the moon, however, does not have too much of an impact on travel time. The duration of the trip will depend more on how fast your spaceship is and which way you go to the moon. For example, in 1959. Luna 2 reached Moon in only 34 hours. The record was set by NASA in 2006, although with the New Horizons robe, not spacecraft, but it only took eight and a half hours to reach the Moon."

https://departingearth.com/how-long-did-it-take-to-get-to-the-moon-in-1969/

So, where the heck is this rocket actually going, if the moon, worst case scenario, is only 405,000 km (251,655.33 miles) away?

Tell me, without telling me, that we never really went to the Moon:

"Scientists will assess how future astronauts will experience the stresses of space by measuring how much cosmic radiation mannequins aboard the Orion capsule endured during the test flight. The mission will also launch several CubeSats, or miniature satellites, with science missions.

However, NASA's main goal with Artemis I is to test every function of the launch and spaceflight system — including Orion's communication and navigation systems and its heat shield, which must withstand a fiery plummet through Earth's atmosphere at 25,000 miles per hour at temperatures reaching 5,000 degrees Fahrenheit — before risking human lives in future missions.

If the uncrewed Orion spaceship makes it around the moon and back without a hitch, the Artemis II mission will carry astronauts on a similar roundabout. The Artemis III mission aims to put humans on the moon in 2025."

One would think that we'd already know just how bad the van Allen radiation belt is, or how to build a module that can withstand earth re-entry...if we'd already done it several times before, that is. Hmm.....

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– SemperSupra [S] 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

They are so desperate to keep this witch in the senate.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/lisa-murkowski-advances-alaskas-ranked-054208591.html

Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) comfortably advanced in Tuesday’s all-party primary election, setting her up against three challengers in November ― including one backed by former President Donald Trump ― in her state’s new system of ranked-choice voting.

Ranked choice is a way to "rig".

What’s more interesting is Alaska’s election process itself: Under its new system, primary elections no longer pit Republicans against Republicans and Democrats against Democrats. Instead, all candidates compete against each other, regardless of party affiliation, and the four candidates with the most votes compete in the general election in November. That election, too, will use ranked-choice voting.

Yeah but that's not how "ranked" choice works because you can use people's second choice to give votes instead.

Beyond that, the longtime Republican senator certainly benefits from the state’s new election system, which voters approved in 2020. In the primary, all Murkowski had to do was be one of the four top vote-getters to advance. In the general election, Murkowski, who is easily the most moderate Republican in today’s Senate, is likely to pull votes from Republicans, independents and Democrats as they rank their top picks.

Yup. It's to prevent a conservative from winning in Alaska.

Alaska’s general election will essentially function like an instant runoff. Voters’ second, third and fourth choices are only factored in if their first and later choices finish last and don’t make it to the next round. The election ends when one candidate gets more than 50%.

So the Trump-endorsed could get first, but they will then take votes from people's second and third choice and give it to Lisa anyway if the voter's "first" choice does make the top two.

They put RANKED voting the GOP primary just to protect Lisa Murokowski. They wanted the bitch that badly.

The commenters in the article are all shills going "Omg, Ranked is so good because it prevents extremists from winning and makes sure only "moderates" can win". Aka DS goons.

You can see the Leftists begging that Ranked Voting be made the law of the land to prevent conservative candidates from having a chance. Aka sociopaths crying how they don't want the people having a voice.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– LoneWulf 1 point 2 years ago +2 / -1

What were the Alaskan voters thinking when they allowed rank-choice voting? The entire country can't even manage a simple ballot election without it being rigged, let alone something as complicated as rank-choice.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– SemperSupra [S] 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

I believe the moon landings were comms for DECLAS in JFK's time.

The United States' Apollo 11 was the first crewed mission to land on the Moon, on 20 July 1969.[4] There were six crewed U.S. landings between 1969 and 1972, and numerous uncrewed landings, with no soft landings happening between 22 August 1976 and 14 December 2013.

The United States is the only country to have successfully conducted crewed missions to the Moon, with the last departing the lunar surface in December 1972. All soft landings took place on the near side of the Moon until 3 January 2019, when the Chinese Chang'e 4 spacecraft made the first landing on the far side of the Moon.

JFK

John F. Kennedy, the 35th president of the United States, was assassinated on Friday, November 22, 1963, at 12:30 p.m. CST in Dallas, Texas, while riding in a presidential motorcade through Dealey Plaza.[

https://history.nasa.gov/moondec.html

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– SemperSupra [S] 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Q was asked if the moon landings were real. Q said they were but...

alse, MOON LANDINGs are real. Programs exist that are outside of public domain.

But implied that the REAL moon landings were never seen by the public.

This gives me the impression the Buzz Aldrin and other moon landings are FAKE. Those were made for the public. That way the public would agree to pouring billions into NASA.

The real moon landings have never been seen. Does it make sense that the US is the only country to ever send someone to land on the moon? If we could do it, why wouldn't other countries take their selfies there. Japan landed a satellite on a comet, but "oh no we can do the moon".

They probably have all sorts of secret stuff on the moon by now. There is something out there they found that they DON'T want us to know about.

As I said, there is zero reason to feed and supply 14 astronauts in space. What do they do all day? It's a lot of expense for little work.

I think it's just a cover for what they really launch. I think the "face" astronauts are just actors. The real astronauts are people we never see.

permalink parent save report block reply