The shills are the Pharisees. That's awesome.

on the topic of shilling, have you seen this stuff going around about how the unvaxed are the heroes,? I've seen several different things. That seems contrived to me too.

THE INTERNET

It was originally called ARPANET

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARPANET

The Advanced Research Projects Agency Network (ARPANET) was the first wide-area packet-switched network with distributed control and one of the first networks to implement the TCP/IP protocol suite. Both technologies became the technical foundation of the Internet. The ARPANET was established by the Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA) of the United States Department of Defense.[1]

Building on the ideas of J. C. R. Licklider, Bob Taylor initiated the ARPANET project in 1966 to enable access to remote computers.[2] Taylor appointed Larry Roberts as program manager. Roberts made the key decisions about the network design.[3] He incorporated Donald Davies' concepts and designs for packet switching,[4][5] and sought input from Paul Baran.[6] ARPA awarded the contract to build the network to Bolt Beranek & Newman who developed the first protocol for the network.[7] Roberts engaged Leonard Kleinrock at UCLA to develop mathematical methods for analyzing the packet network technology.

Internetworking research in the early 1970s led by Bob Kahn at DARPA and Vint Cerf at Stanford University and later DARPA formulated the Transmission Control Program,[11] which incorporated concepts from the French CYCLADES project. As this work progressed, a protocol was developed by which multiple separate networks could be joined into a network of networks.

Access to the ARPANET was expanded in 1981, when the National Science Foundation (NSF) funded the Computer Science Network (CSNET). In the early 1980s, the NSF funded the establishment of national supercomputing centers at several universities, and provided network access and network interconnectivity with the NSFNET project in 1986. The ARPANET was formally decommissioned in 1990, after partnerships with the telecommunication and computer industry had assured private sector expansion and future commercialization of an expanded world-wide network, known as the Internet.

The ARPANET was not started to create a Command and Control System that would survive a nuclear attack, as many now claim. To build such a system was, clearly, a major military need, but it was not ARPA's mission to do this; in fact, we would have been severely criticized had we tried. Rather, the ARPANET came out of our frustration that there were only a limited number of large, powerful research computers in the country, and that many research investigators, who should have access to them, were geographically separated from them.

The ARPANET incorporated distributed computation, and frequent re-computation, of routing tables. This increased the survivability of the network in the face of significant interruption. Automatic routing was technically challenging at the time. The ARPANET was designed to survive subordinate-network losses, since the principal reason was that the switching nodes and network links were unreliable, even without any nuclear attacks

The first four nodes were designated as a testbed for developing and debugging the 1822 protocol, which was a major undertaking. While they were connected electronically in 1969, network applications were not possible until the Network Control Protocol was implemented in 1970 enabling the first two host-host protocols, remote login (Telnet) and file transfer (FTP) which were specified and implemented between 1969 and 1973.[8][9][57] The network was declared operational in 1971. Network traffic began to grow once email was established at the majority of sites by around 1973.

The first successful host to host connection on the ARPANET was made between Stanford Research Institute (SRI) and UCLA, by SRI programmer Bill Duvall and UCLA student programmer Charley Kline, at 10:30 pm PST on 29 October 1969 (6:30 UTC on 30 October 1969)

Between 10/28/2017 (first Q post) and 10/29/1969 are 17,531 days.

Just wanted note that.

The first permanent ARPANET link was established on 21 November 1969, between the IMP at UCLA and the IMP at the Stanford Research Institute. By 5 December 1969, the initial four-node network was established.

The DoD made TCP/IP standard for all military computer networking in 1980.[73] NORSAR and University College London left the ARPANET and began using TCP/IP over SATNET in early 1982.[74]

On January 1, 1983, known as flag day, TCP/IP protocols became the standard for the ARPANET, replacing the earlier Network Control Protocol

Separating the civil and military networks reduced the 113-node ARPANET by 68 nodes. After MILNET was split away, the ARPANET would continue be used as an Internet backbone for researchers, but be slowly phased out.

In 1985, the National Science Foundation (NSF) funded the establishment of national supercomputing centers at several universities, and provided network access and network interconnectivity with the NSFNET project in 1986. NSFNET became the Internet backbone for government agencies and universities.

Senator Al Gore authored the High Performance Computing and Communication Act of 1991, commonly referred to as "The Gore Bill", after hearing the 1988 concept for a National Research Network submitted to Congress by a group chaired by Leonard Kleinrock. The bill was passed on 9 December 1991 and led to the National Information Infrastructure (NII) which Gore called the information superhighway.

Do you know where AOL came from?

The service traces its history to an online service known as PlayNET. PlayNET licensed its software to Quantum Link (Q-Link), who went online in November 1985. A new IBM PC client launched in 1988, eventually renamed as America Online in 1989. AOL grew to become the largest online service, displacing established players like CompuServe and The Source. By 1995, AOL had about three million active users.

The point is the entire internet was built and developed by the US MIL.

https://www.pcrisk.com/internet-threat-news/9995-how-the-us-military-built-encryption-and-the-internet

So was encryption. Then one day the US MIL decided to share this and let the public use this technology. They also shared the GPS systems (tracking).

The whole world now depends on what the US MIL created.

You might not know this, but the US Military created much of the encryption technology that we use today, including TOR, the cloaking software used by Edward Snowden and others. They also created SSL and the RSA algorithm. The US Military even invented the internet, in 1969. It was called ARPANET then. And they had a hand in funding everything from the laser to UNIX.

This does not mean that programmers working for the military wrote all of these programs and made all of these devices. Instead the American Department of Defense awarded contracts to mathematicians, companies, and cryotograpers who developed all of this, except Navy programmers wrote TOR.

The Data Encryption Standard was created in 1975 when the NSA solicited proposals for how to protect government data. The NSA is part of the Department of Defense. IBM responded with a proposal. The NSA published their algorithm and put it out for public comment. The best mathematical minds and cryptographers tried to find its weaknesses. A series of back and forth comments led to several revisions so that today we have the AES standard, yet DES remains in use. AES256, for example, is used in all kinds of encryption, like disk drive encryption.

Decode Blog's latest posts goes into Frozen (2013) and Snowden. Q talked about how Snowden was used to target and try to blind the NSA (DOD) so that the criminals could have blue skies for the Iran Deal. They were tired of being watched all the time. They thought it was the NSA and they wanted it hobbled. Obama and his thieves wanted it hobbled.

The US Navy Research Labs funded the development of TOR. Initially it was written by its own employees. But then TOR was spun off as its own project. Then the Electronic Freedom Foundation and others continued its funding. But the majority of funding then and today continues to come from the US Military. That has led to reckless reporting that TOR has been comprised by the US government. But that has shown not to be the case. And as we just explained, since anyone can read and compile the source code, they can see that there is no US government code there. (But someone would need to use the source code and not the already-compiled binary to be sure.)

Perhaps the largest example of where the US Military has entered the academic and research community is RAND. Encryption starts with mathematics. John Nash worked at RAND. He was the mathematician depicted in the film “A Beautiful Mind.” John von Neumann is another mathematician who worked with RAND. He is one of the world’s most famous mathematicians. He and John Nash clashed over how to approach game theory.

An anon asked Q:

Is INTERNET infrastructure being safeguarded to prevent shut down?

Q replied:

NSA ability to overreach hosts possible.

Q post #932 says:

The creation of the INTERNET and ‘connecting’ platforms is bringing about their downfall.

Failure to control.

MSM is dead.

Which backs up my theory. I think the US MIL created the internet and released it for the purpose of pulling the criminals out of their previous and very secretive methods of communication. They all use a system that the US MIL made, even China. China tried to invent it's own internet and only ended up making a poor clone. They don't know how to make the same.

Q wrote:

NO SUCH AGENCY.

Tool dev primary + meta essential.

Easy cover.

Acts so sick & evil conspiracy push / fake reality almost always wins.

Q also implies that the acts the CULT does are so sick and depraved that it's too much for most to handle. People would rather believe it a conspiracy theory than that anyone could do these things to another person.

And Q wrote:

[CLAS-N-DI_9] gg_dump [NO SUCH AGENCY].

It does not technically exist as open-source.

And this post:

Military Intelligence, NO SUCH AGENCY = key

POTUS and Patriots = stone

What is NO SUCH AGENCY - Q group?

My theory is that the DS and the criminals screwed themselves by embracing the internet. They used it to spy on the sheep, but the US MIL used it to spy on them and learn their cells. They were very hidden and hard to detect. They created sleeper cells and secrets everywhere. Very hard to fight. The internet gave the tools to fight and defeat this evil that has been misleading and manipulating humans for a long, long time.

u/dty6

u/lonewulf

u/basedcitizen

OPERATION TRUST?

Shills push hard the shill line that "Q is Operation Trust" and "Trump is a black hat meant to keep us from resisting the New World Order" and that the only way is "violent overthrow of the government.".

I wanted to have a private discussion on this topic without shills popping in to derail.

I have many reasons I think this is bunk, but I'd also like to hear your reasons.

First, as I've stated, the sheep are the brainwashed apaths who pretend not to see the evil, the low-level narcissists and sociopaths who don't even know what they are a part of but love the benefits, the middle people who blackmailed or participate willingly in the crimes, and the sociopaths and psychopaths at the top. Regardless of who you think is a black hat and who you think is a white, sociopaths are NEVER going to be a force for good. They may just be bent over a barrel and forced to help because they are terrified of exposure.

The real question is "Do you think Q and the Trump movement are plans that sociopaths would come up to prevent conservatives from resisting?" I'd say NO.

The DS top plotters are all people devoid of empathy who live to dominate and control others. If you believe in Pizzagate (which is real), do you think any person with a conscience could harm kids that way? If no, then we can rule out that they are normal-thinking people. They have no conscience which means they are sociopaths and psychopaths.

This is important for understand who is in charge and who is winning.

Sociopaths are good at long-term scheming, but not long-term planning. They can't unify, build a society or bring out the best in others. What they do is create a "boogeyman" to frighten you into their "cult" and tell you how you are great compared to that terrible, racist "other". This is division, but it can look like unity.

They are parasitic by nature and need a "host" (the producers of society) to supply them. At the same time they fear their host will unite together and remove the parasites (them) so they have to keep the host in a state of anxiety and fear and confusion to prevent this. Psychopaths and sociopaths don't trust. They actually don't even make the oxycontin in the brain that allows for trust like normal people.

They don't EVEN trust each other which is why they have to have "insurance" to prevent the others from double crossing them.

So let's look at exhibit A:

The reaction of the sociopaths to Trump's victory in 2016:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hcrjb5dzhvw

Look at the devastated leftists. Obama spent 8 years beating down conservatives. Do you think Obama and his goons wanted conservatives to feel this happy just to "keep them from resisting"?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ph5ctOK4fE

I don't buy that. You could see their misery. It was all around you the crying, the rage, and the shock. They could NOT accept Trump had won. There is no way Trump was a black hat.

Also the other argument assumes that the sociopaths were just so scared of conservative rebellion. Were they? Obama and the Clintons spent years pissing off and pissing on conservatives with glee. They seemed to want a rebellion so they could mass arrest. They worked to take away the guns, but they seemed more afraid of the military (not fully under their control) than they were of the citizens.

It was their minions that went stark raving mad when Trump won. They had trouble controlling their own. They do not let the hated "other" feel like they've won for even a second. Sociopaths can't stand you feeling you've "won" for even a second. Not even when it would benefit them to do so. It's just not in their nature. They fall to pieces if they feel their control slipping. Despair and fear is their control.

Trump's constant mocking of them drives their base into insanity and keeps conservatives together and unified. That in no way benefits them.

They do not let anyone tell the truth without making it sound crazy. Not even their own plants. If Trump were a black hat, he'd do like Alex Jones and make the truth sound crazy and the lies sound legit. He would set up his base and then crush them with disappointment.

When they have a "plant", the plant stumbles and faceplants to embarrass us so that the Left can mock how he follow "morons". Their tactics to make us like the plant is to start mass-banning them and then push on LEFTISTS sites how "hehehe conservatives losing their mind because their hero Alex Jones got deplatformed". This tactic is meant to drive us to rush to defend the plant.

As for Q to be Operation Trust they'd be spending a lot of effort trying to coordinate with Trump to make Q believable. If Trump is NOT a black hat, then Q therefore can't be Operation Trust.

The two are interlinked. Q proofs were highly linked to Trump and those around him. Many proofs would require the cooperation of him and his associates. If the clowns were just tryin to "predict" Trump's tweets then there would have been errors. They wouldn't have gotten it right or been so precise.

Trump would have to be a black hat for Q to be Operation Trust.

Both must be true or neither is trust. It can't be one is true and one is not.

Furthermore, for the DS to go to this must trouble to create Q and put Trump into power all to make conservatives "not resist them" would suggest they were terrified of conservatives. If they were that scared, they would have taken more drastic actions. (Think a cornered animal). Obama would not have gone out of his way to piss off conservatives if they were that scared of us.

Truthfully, they were shared the fear of exposure, but they weren't afraid of conservatives themselves. They had us divided and were pushing the country to civil war.

If the whole goal of the DS was to make conservatives not resist them, then why are their shills now pushing so, so hard for armed revolution? We see false flags trying to paint us as violence. They are trying to push us to violence. It seems like Q gets in the way of that.

No, I just don't buy it. What are your opinions on it?