I just received a pdf in Dutch with quite an extensive complaint in which the whole government of The Netherlands will be put on trial in a civil case.

The Alliance for Government Issues (Bond voor Overheidszaken) has filed with the court of The Hague. And the defendants have been served.

Funny part is that the Spouse of finance Minister Hoekstra refused the summons.

Please, keep in mind, The Netherlands does have a Constitution, however, it is not in effect, as no judge may use it to try any law. And international treaties, and this is a very wide ranging term, have the force of law and make the Dutch Constitutional Provisions void.

The basic premise is, that because the executive was demisionary, and by promoting the overtaking of the government of the Netherlands by a foreign power (Think EU/ WEF/ WHO) they overstepped their discretionary powers and are actually performing government business in a civil capacity.

They claim an end to (among others):

1. An end to the support of the war in Ukraine.
2. An end to all covid-measures.
3. An end to vaxx-pushing.
4. Total and unredacted papers to all the communications, contracts, agreements, etc with the WEF, WHO, EU.
5. They call upon the UVRM which states that no State is allowed to take such measures having the object of destroying the human rights.
6. They call upon the UN treaty concerning the Rights of the Indigenous Peoples in ending the mass-immigration.
7. The end to the Nitrogen -crisis-pushing, the plans to expropriate farmers for these reasons, the total and unrestricted, unredacted communications, agreements, etc with third parties in this scheme.
8. for the judge to decide whether voting is performed under civil law.

And much more.

Anyway, it applaud this effort!
It has the hallmarks of being a historic thing.

I would also add that the front men for this Alliance, in the past, have gained favorable rulings, especially in the case where it concerned the obliged health insurance, which finally was deemed to be counter human rights, as every person is quite capable of considering which association his membership and money is worthy.

I see a couple of issues with this new case, and I would not be surprised to learn that a judge will be reluctant to impose upon the political public law process through civil procedure. But there are some questions at law as well, which constitute quite an escape route. For instance, the burden of proof to sustain the claim measure have the object of destroying human rights (UVRM). And then the issue with the public vs civil position of Rutte, Kaag en Hoekstra. I am not sure that will hold up.

It will also be interesting to see whether these people will use public resources to defend themselves in a civil court. That would be another scandal. One that would foster a vote of no confidence, which would automatically cause new elections if accepted by the 2nd Chamber of Parliament.

At any rate, you are now informed of the happenings in the Low Countries.