I had a thought about Darnkness and 10 days dark
🤔💭 Theory 😲💡
As far as I can tell the Election machines need an internet connection to determine how the vote should be changed in almost real time. What if we kill the internet on Election night? Darnkness. Does their system fail? What if we had Milions of IP adresses prepared for a misdirection or modification of data? Funny thing is is that with Starlink many around the world would still be on line the whole 10 days. Just thinking out loud. Any thoughts?
u/lonewulf
Do you remember those articles I sent you about ICANN and Q talking about why Obama tried to hand over control of the internet? What do you think in this context?
SemperSupra, would you post those links here or in a brand new thread? You are describing some details I don't think I am aware of. Thanks
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWhzHECM9is
Black Pigeon Speaks did a great breakdown. It was stickied a few days ago if you missed it.
As for ICANN, Q goes into that and asks why did Obama do it?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICANN
https://futurism.com/control-over-the-internet-no-longer-belongs-to-the-u-s-government
Q post #2305:
Goes into details about John Perry Barlow who wrote an internet Bill of Rights.
Puts who at ease? Criminals? Foreign powers? They were furious about NSA watching them and they used Snowden to make blue skies for the criminal activities.
Very helpful mate; I appreciate it. Have a great day.
Well, if I understand all of this correctly...
There needs to be a governing body that maintains the standards for the internet because all parties must agree on the protocols involved in transmitting and receiving data. Everyone must be speaking the same internet "language" in order to successfully transmit and receive data from one another. IP addresses must be maintained and doled out, as needed.
The question then becomes, who maintains the standards? One would hope control goes to a group of people that understand the ramifications of their decisions and who operate with everyone's best interests at heart. Ah, there's the rub.
Obama handed all of this off to a private California company. Why? Why not keep it within the government, like a bureau of standards, which would seem the most logical route to go?
This is a lot of power to hand off to a private company. Who is overseeing ICANN? What does ICANN stand to gain by having this control? Who is behind ICANN?
Lots of questions here. I don't know enough about ICANN to say.