I reread the response to the motion this evening after reading @paulsperry (mentioned below) about Jay Bratt revealing “key investigative details”. It wasn’t a specific mention of Hillary, more the way the response read.
There’s 3 issues addressed but number one is the crux.
Is he entitled to return of property?
Technically, all presidential records belong to the US, however, executive privilege applies if there’s proprietary interest in the presidential records. Trumps original motion states it was information or documents gained during his presidency so he has executive privilege. The response yesterday claims that’s proof that it belongs to the US. The question is what would one consider proprietary interest?
Collusion, proof of election interference, treason, russia gate, DNC spying on campaign, etc. all possible classified info that came into possession during his term. All personal stakes for trump. Does he have proprietary interest? Now consider restrictions to access of the records and the EO’s. (It’s late but I’ll dig for the one bouncing around in my head mañana)
Once the archivist notified Trumps attorney, he fell within the range of statue to claim executive privilege (the response claims it wasn’t filed urgently but it’s by the books). IMO, this was what caused panic and led them to obtain the shady warrant which encompassed personal effects. It’s a “good faith” loophole. I’m not sure I articulated my connections very well but this is how I foresee the judgement tomorrow.
The injunction will be denied.
The special master will be allowed (it’s a slippery slope violation of the 4th amendment)
The return of property will be dependent on the special master.
Sure would be something if they found something but won’t be able to use it bc it was a violation of the 4A, however, I doubt the documents they were looking for would be in his office. He’s not stupid. Tomorrow we see how Act 1657 scene 6 plays out! 😜
I feel like when the NARA came to see the documents, Trump communicated to them that he has these documents.
When FBI came first time to MAL, he communicated where these documents will be.
Now he has legally handed over these documents to a group in FBI. Right after that, it looks like the blackhat handler for that group - Thibault - was removed, so strings cut.
Now these filings are further communications of what else was collected, what should be sent back and what should be kept. Remember, the raid happened when the blackhat strings were not cut.
I think we are watching a very complex operation in motion.
He’s not dumb and seems to always have a plan in place. It seems there’s always a way to get the public informed and anons searching for connections. Hysterical that the media comes here to get news, even if it’s a spin off of the topic. It almost seems like he continues to weed out the corrupt. BTW… regarding another conversation we had, the more people I follow on TS, the more it seems my original theory was correct when checking the date joined
Wait, did any document mention Hillary stuff, or are you referring to Trump's truth?
I reread the response to the motion this evening after reading @paulsperry (mentioned below) about Jay Bratt revealing “key investigative details”. It wasn’t a specific mention of Hillary, more the way the response read.
There’s 3 issues addressed but number one is the crux.
Technically, all presidential records belong to the US, however, executive privilege applies if there’s proprietary interest in the presidential records. Trumps original motion states it was information or documents gained during his presidency so he has executive privilege. The response yesterday claims that’s proof that it belongs to the US. The question is what would one consider proprietary interest?
Collusion, proof of election interference, treason, russia gate, DNC spying on campaign, etc. all possible classified info that came into possession during his term. All personal stakes for trump. Does he have proprietary interest? Now consider restrictions to access of the records and the EO’s. (It’s late but I’ll dig for the one bouncing around in my head mañana)
Once the archivist notified Trumps attorney, he fell within the range of statue to claim executive privilege (the response claims it wasn’t filed urgently but it’s by the books). IMO, this was what caused panic and led them to obtain the shady warrant which encompassed personal effects. It’s a “good faith” loophole. I’m not sure I articulated my connections very well but this is how I foresee the judgement tomorrow.
The injunction will be denied. The special master will be allowed (it’s a slippery slope violation of the 4th amendment) The return of property will be dependent on the special master.
Sure would be something if they found something but won’t be able to use it bc it was a violation of the 4A, however, I doubt the documents they were looking for would be in his office. He’s not stupid. Tomorrow we see how Act 1657 scene 6 plays out! 😜
Thanks for this.
I think a clear picture is emerging. It almost feels like the whole thing is a communication between various factions and Trump. I put some thoughts here: https://greatawakening.win/p/15JTpBH2dt/the-dates-on-the-documents-in-th/c/
I feel like when the NARA came to see the documents, Trump communicated to them that he has these documents.
When FBI came first time to MAL, he communicated where these documents will be.
Now he has legally handed over these documents to a group in FBI. Right after that, it looks like the blackhat handler for that group - Thibault - was removed, so strings cut.
Now these filings are further communications of what else was collected, what should be sent back and what should be kept. Remember, the raid happened when the blackhat strings were not cut.
I think we are watching a very complex operation in motion.
He’s not dumb and seems to always have a plan in place. It seems there’s always a way to get the public informed and anons searching for connections. Hysterical that the media comes here to get news, even if it’s a spin off of the topic. It almost seems like he continues to weed out the corrupt. BTW… regarding another conversation we had, the more people I follow on TS, the more it seems my original theory was correct when checking the date joined