A boiled-down explanation of the federal government was create money for circulation, regulate trade within each state and outside countries, and protect them from invasion. The giant behemoth we have right now is so far out of its constitutional bounds that we may as well shred the original document. It must be very severely reduced in size, along with not replacing many things as a lot of its current functions should be the responsibilities of the states.
You made nothing clear. But you're right, it was a bit dickish to call you a doomer, when I just should have moved to the next post. I don't agree that we should restructure or keep any fed cops, because I'm a libertarian. I guess I was just annoyed by your delivery. You talk about yourself a lot..
It is the right thing to do and shouldn't be replaced with anything.
A boiled-down explanation of the federal government was create money for circulation, regulate trade within each state and outside countries, and protect them from invasion. The giant behemoth we have right now is so far out of its constitutional bounds that we may as well shred the original document. It must be very severely reduced in size, along with not replacing many things as a lot of its current functions should be the responsibilities of the states.
Doom much? Why not initiate the replacement, THEN dismantle? Much less drama that way. Did you oversee the pullout of Afghanistan?
You made nothing clear. But you're right, it was a bit dickish to call you a doomer, when I just should have moved to the next post. I don't agree that we should restructure or keep any fed cops, because I'm a libertarian. I guess I was just annoyed by your delivery. You talk about yourself a lot..