Pardon me for mentioning what may already be looming in everyone's minds, but I haven't seen it discussed yet and thought I would throw a seed crystal into the supercooled medium of this page.
I am not a Q fanatic, so I take no arrows for being imprecise in my reference, but I seem to recall that Q placed a specific emphasis on how the "First Arrest" would have galvanizing significance.
In light of recent events, I would float the speculation that the First Arrest will be of President Trump.
It has some interesting explanatory power. First of all, if Trump is in a state of "devolved" authority, being arrested by an occupying foreign power is probably a "red line" that would finally trigger military countermeasures. Secondly, it would fit exactly well with the entire document scenario (a tar-baby trap with the documents as bait) and Trump's seemingly strange ebullience over the whole subject, as though he is itching for the trap to spring. The "trap" in this case being his arrest and getting the Deep State to cross the Rubicon that his Presidential Executive Orders anticipated.
There may be more along the same theme, but I think fellow anons can grab this bone and chew on it. Please do so. I would love to see if I am on the right beam.
It wasn’t kleinsmith or Epstein?
Epstein was first arrest, and Ghislaine was first indictment.
how do the mods not cut this off quicker yet? how is the answer way down here?
And complete flops they were, insofar as public awareness is concerned. They were tabloid sideshows, on the front pages of The Globe and the National Enquirer. (I know. I read all about them there.) Their connection to fundamental political corruption is obscure, in the popular mind. I mean, strongly suspecting what they were doing, as I was, I thought the indictments, arrests, convictions, imprisonments, etc., were a total nothingburger. In terms of popular thought, they may as well have not existed.
How do you know they were the "first" arrest and the "first" indictment? People of all stripes are arrested or indicted daily. You could pick any of them at random can call them "first." This is typical Q-ish ambiguity. We won't know what is "first" until we see the effects.
The first arrest was Jeffrey Epstein. First indictment was Ghislaine Maxwell because Jeffrey died (or was whisked away into witness protection) before it could happen.
And if you don't think that indictment triggered a mass pop awakening?
u/#q4566
What was "impressive, most impressive?"
Nurse Deplorable's Tweet, which is archived here-
https://archive.ph/XOTJ7
And what happened on July 2, 2020?
u/#q3508
https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/ghislaine-maxwell-jeffrey-epstein-arrest-856874/
Archive - https://archive.ph/0xIET
Q wasn't ambiguous at all. You just didn't study the drops and are speculating on things that were already covered.
P.S. This is what you call a flop, insofar as public awareness is concerned?
Ghislaine: Partner in Crime aired on Paramount+.
Who Is Ghislaine Maxwell? aired on STARZ.
Chasing Ghislaine aired on Amazon.
Victoria's Secret: Angels and Demons, which covers Les Wexner's relationship with Epstein and Maxwell, aired on Hulu.
Jeffrey Epstein: Filthy Rich aired on Netflix and was one of the most watched shows in their history when it first debuted.
It's also worth noting the co-producer of the Netflix show Jeffrey Epstein: Filthy Rich was author James Patterson, who collaborated on a fictional mystery novel The President is Missing with Bill Clinton in 2018.
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/books/article-james-patterson-on-the-president-is-missing-his-collaboration-with/
So, yes, the coverage and content on many of these shows was heavily censored and produced in such a way to implicate Donald Trump and exonerate deep state Democrats and their allies as much as possible.
However, when you keep in mind these shows were produced by the same networks that buried the Epstein story in years prior to his actual arrest, there can be no argument it produced a mass pop awakening.
I'd be willing to wager if we polled 100 random Americans, more of them would know who Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell are than who Kamala Harris is.
They might also know who the Queen of England is. Widespread knowledge of trivia means nothing. All I know is that the only serious discussion of these persons I have encountered is on this page. Outside, in the real world, nobody talks about them or their implications. Not even on conservative talk radio. Ergo, no mass popular awakening.