Pardon me for mentioning what may already be looming in everyone's minds, but I haven't seen it discussed yet and thought I would throw a seed crystal into the supercooled medium of this page.
I am not a Q fanatic, so I take no arrows for being imprecise in my reference, but I seem to recall that Q placed a specific emphasis on how the "First Arrest" would have galvanizing significance.
In light of recent events, I would float the speculation that the First Arrest will be of President Trump.
It has some interesting explanatory power. First of all, if Trump is in a state of "devolved" authority, being arrested by an occupying foreign power is probably a "red line" that would finally trigger military countermeasures. Secondly, it would fit exactly well with the entire document scenario (a tar-baby trap with the documents as bait) and Trump's seemingly strange ebullience over the whole subject, as though he is itching for the trap to spring. The "trap" in this case being his arrest and getting the Deep State to cross the Rubicon that his Presidential Executive Orders anticipated.
There may be more along the same theme, but I think fellow anons can grab this bone and chew on it. Please do so. I would love to see if I am on the right beam.
The subject of arrest is open. Verify what "action"? Confirm what "future direction"? Don't mistake your favorite picks for the true subjects. We should by now be familiar with Q's penchant for ambiguity (in order to keep the Deep State guessing).
I'm not so convinced that Gislaine Maxwell counts as the "first indictment." Indictment for what? I think it is clear that the masses are borderline oblivious to the matter of Epstein and possible child molestation. There is no popular mental connection between that and government mal- and mis-feasance.