Haven’t been keeping up with the latest info much these days. Was the “shall we play once more” post confirmed as legit?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (23)
sorted by:
So what you're saying is you're speculating and in your opinion you don't know.
If that is the case, you're possibly misleading people by saying definitively "No. NewQ is fake Q. Don't get mislead."
But that's by your own reasoning. By my reasoning, I can definitively say the trips match.
I'm not casting out speculation (speculation is good), but you're definitively telling people what to think about "new" Q based on your speculation and you further qualified that anything other than what you said would be misleading.
Trips alone are ultimately meaningless due to Chaos Theory- all passwords can be cracked, or otherwise compromised regardless of its complexity. Need more than just that.
My point there is you're telling people definitively what to think admittedly based on speculation and said anything other than what you said is misleading.
I don't know for sure if Q's password was cracked or the website was hacked or misused, but what other alternative is there? If we begin assuming Q's posts with matching tripcodes are fake, how do we know some portion of old Q posts weren't also fake at the time? We're just going to assume contextually without any further comms regarding fake Q posts?
What would have been more ideal is if Q just posted a public key, and could post ubiquitously across different forums as-needed with signed messages. But of course, if Q answered every "hardball question" with specificity, like you claim to expect, then they would have posted a public key.
Anyways, as I said, in regards to Q's posts and matching trips, personally I am going with Occam's Razor and the lack of an alternative, and assuming matching trips are Q for now unless demonstrated otherwise. No outside comms.
And that is part of the problem with placing too much faith in trip codes, because we DO know that at least one Q post in the past was indeed a fraud post- the infamous "B" post.
Which, ironically enough, was the first post that the NewQ imposter removed from the record.
The B post was never demonstrated to be a hacker, and it wasn't even signed "Q" at the bottom, so we can't even say it claimed to be Q. It didn't have a tripcode either.
Somebody asked "new" Q to remove the B post from Q's private board and it was removed.
You're again speculating, making assumptions based on your speculation, and then presenting it as determinative reality... We don't know B was a fraud post or a hacker, and B never claimed to be Q.
What he's saying is that you're speaking definitively. The truth is, none of us know. And while I do agree that I don't trust 8k anymore, B itself does not preclude that he isn't back somewhere. And, given that Donald's becoming increasingly overt, perhaps then we should be Iooking for deItas on other platforms at the very Ieast. Either way, we all should beopen to all kinds of possibiIities.