This sex ed book tells minors to go online to "safely" research their kinks and fantasies. They promote porn to minors calling it a "fun, sugary treat" & to research by watching their "favorite porn performers". This goes way beyond grooming. This is sexual enticement of minors.😡😡😡
(media.greatawakening.win)
🤢 These people are sick! 🤮
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (25)
sorted by:
A 12 and 13 year old is still a kid. This isn't even up for discussion or argument, and there is no actual response you can successfully make against this point so I would avoid trying.
Possibly. But they tried that, and we ended up in a very awful position.
This can be a slippery slope. Additionally, this is not relevant to schooling. This is something up for parents to decide. If you want to make a commentary on parenting and how they should be gradually increasing freedom and responsibility, I'm right there with you. But schools do not get to make this dictation to the kids over their parents.
True, repression has consequences but this would probably be a "meet in the middle" argument which neither side is willing to do at the present juncture, as they are too far apart now.
We are in agreement (sort of) but getting kids addicted to porn has a lot of far reaching developmental problems, both physically and socially. Thus, advocating porn directly to children in the primes of their youth is nothing short of destructive degeneracy.
Even a video game can improve physical and mental reflex, hand-eye coordination and increase the speed of problem solving.
There is nothing beneficial to porn except the dopamine hit, so while I don't think it should be stigmatized like our side tends to do, I do absolutely NOT ever agree with providing this sort of material to very young youth.