The CDC has been hiding the Social Security Administration death master file. I got it from a whistleblower. This shows deaths are taking 5 months from the jab to happen. This is why it's hard to see.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/this-one-graph-tells-you-everything
I know some people had at least 4 jabs and they are still alive today. Hmm?
...the jabs are only 90% "effective"...
...doggy winks....
I don’t believe this. Almost every single person in my family and at work was vaxxed (many 3+ times) over a year ago and still perfectly alive. If 5 months was true there would be literally be millions of Americans dying each month. It would be completely and utterly impossible to hide that much death.
...batches...
....not everyone got the same vaccine....
..."sometimes you just have to grab the ball and run with it son"...
Grandpa Dog
The entire military is vaxxed since late 2020, shouldn't they all be dying by now? That's millions of people/families. You think those millions of families are hiding millions of deaths from everyone around them? It would be literally impossible.
The "5 months" data is bunk, or the author is being misled by false data.
The only possible explaination is not all shots are hot
I agree! I also read somewhere that there are 3 lots - one was saline and one was mild and one was HOT. I would also like to see this data broken down by Red States and Blue States and I believe we would see the death rate is higher in Red States!
I read the same too and it just makes too much sense to roll out the clot shots like this. The evil doers want the population reduced as much as possible but not so fast that it is obvious. And of course why wouldn't they try to target their political enemies first and foremost!
No, it's not. Here's another explanation: the author is making faulty assumptions, or the article is based on faulty data. This is called being wrong.
Just because someone writes an article (an opinion piece) and makes an assumption about graphs, doesn't mean their assumptions are correct. You and I could do the same thing right now. This is why scientific journals exist, to confirm or deny if someone is correct.
Anyone can say anything on the internet, and if enough people share it, people will believe it.
I understand your logic and agree with it, but in my life I anecdotally see the evidence that not all shots are hot. All I meant was in general at the end of the day I believe all we can assume with some modicum of confidence is my assertion. I say this because I know of several people who died after, one who got shingles, another who got bells palsey that essentially paralyzed them from the waist down and now they are learning to walk again, and of course a handful of people that got the shot and are fine. It may be anecdotal but I believe that not all the shots are hot based on the best available evidence in front of me. Part of this being an engineered crisis is that a lot of elements were likely put into play to confuse us by complicating the data so it would be harder to piece together something like "after 5 months everybody dies", but like the life insurance claims going up it is hard to argue against the fact that something IS happening.
I understand, but I would also scrutinize your own anecdotal information.
For example, how do you know every one of these people had these health issues due to the vaccine? You really can't know unless you see every habit off their life, as well as their genetic disposition.
I don't mean to push back, it's just that everyone at my work and personal life (100+ people) have been vaccinated and are totally fine. So I don't think we should trust anecdotes at all.
Empirical data is the best bet so far, in order to avoid confirmation bias.
Well I am in a super red area of a blue state so we suspect (confirmation bias of course) we may have gotten more hot batches because my anecdotal evidence is similar to everyone I talk to in my community. The liberal types try to spin it but it seems they know something is not right. The people who died varied from young and supposedly healthy enough to older and the obits said something to the effect that they "died unexpectedly" and that "cause could not be identified" in almost every case. Enough that "suspicious" puts our feelings mildly.
But this disagreement between us is a part of our trying to understand the woo we find ourselves in, so I appreciate you sharing your anecdotal evidence because we are able to glean info from us doing so. I have been trained in the scientific method enough in grade school and in college so I used to trust empirical data ultimately and blindly but I have awakened to how much these types of data can be cooked if not completely fabricated in the public sphere where it really matters, thus I know I can only trust the empirical data I have collected on a case that I could never have a bias in regards to. While I have seen enough empirical evidence that either confirms my thoughts or suspiciously contradicts in untrustworthy ways, you may have not, and neither of our views really matter because what is coming is already here and no matter what we will look back on it and be surprised about what we got right and what we got wrong.
...batches...
....not everyone got the same vaccine....
You need to look at the basic math.
For example, if 1 million military members are vaccinated, and just 10% of vaccines kill people, that's 100,000 military members and families instantly harmed. Where are they? Also, we know many more millions of people have received the vaccine. Where are all those deaths too?
Your claim breaks down under scrutiny.
Question your own claims first, and try to disprove them, instead of finding articles that agree with your confirmation bias.
...I stand by my comment....
I mean, I just described basic critical thinking (i.e. question your own beliefs), so I don't know why you would willfully choose to be wrong. You do you, I guess 🤷
U.S. Gov. Data reveals every single Death due to COVID Vaccination was caused by just 4 to 5% of the COVID Vaccine batches produced but Medicine Regulators have refused to withdraw them
https://expose-news.com/2022/09/08/gov-data-4percent-batches-caused-all-covid-jab-deaths/
"The data used in the investigation was pulled from the publicly accessible VAERS database which can be viewed here. The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)"
I shouldn't have to explain why this is an inaccurate source of data, but I will briefly. Anyone can report to VAERS, for anything, and VAERS will not verify if the claim is real or valid. For example, I could sprain my ankle, and say that the vaccine caused it, and VAERS would accept that submission without double checking. Same goes for every health related issue. VAERS is just random people writing in submissions, it proves nothing, and yet people STILL bring it up over and over again.
..." sometimes you have to grab the ball and run with it son"....
Grandpa Dog