Trump and those close to him continue to insinuate and posture as if Trump will be returning before 2024....
🧠 Clandestine🕳️
I did an in-depth break down on this a week ago. I cover the tactical, optical, and psychological advantages to having a “redo election”, and Trump continues to hint at it.
Many want an immediate reversal of 2020, but the most effective path would be a redo election. The normies have to see that Trump supporters are the overwhelming majority....
- Clandestine
"As for HOW Trump gets this done, I have no idea..."
The money quote.
I believe Trump comes back before 2024, but not through an Nation-wide re-do "election" on Nov 8. Simply not enough time to get the ballots prepared in 3200 counties. States would somehow have to be mandadted by some mechanism to do this, and absent the authority of the USSC or under supervision by the non-partisan military - I don't see it happening.
In order to be a valid election all States have to participate in an electoral count - no mechanism presentl t o re-visit this. The 5 battleground states of PA, WI, AZ, MI, (or maybe VA instead of GA, or NV instead of MI) might include a voter referendum to decertify just those 5 states, in those 5 states but even that is a stretch given the SOSs involved.
That said, USSC will rule this fall that only legislatures can change voting laws, and then that could be used as the impetus to de-certify any states that changed 2020 practice through courts or emergency powers of Governors - then direct a do-over in those states in Dec or January before the Congress reconvenes.
Another avenue is this one: Lindell has aqcuired Cast Vote Records from ~1000 of 3200 counties in the US and more are coming in. By his experts' reckoning, fully 96% of those show serious evidence of vote manipulation. This is evidence to present to the USSC which could possibly lead to a voiding of the whole election as having been conducted outside the Constitution due to the overwhelming nature of the issue across all States, and the foreign involvement - on the basis of their ruling described above. Under this scheme I could see an Emergency Election re-do Authorization - mandated by the USSC and administered by the non-partisan miltary (National Guard)
Do you have anything saying they would rule this fall? From what I understand they start hearing the case this fall, but decisions would be in June 2023, just like those flurry of decisions we got this year (Roe, EPA, Bruen, etc)
Traditionally, yes, However, they have the freedom to rule right away if they so chose (see Bush v. Gore 2000). The fact that the conduct of an imminent election may be dependent upon the ruling may encourage the Justices to have an increased sense of urgency for issuing such a ruling without delay.