We are spinning at 1,000 MPH while hurtling through space at over 66,600 MPH. We don't feel this motion and the numbers are pretty crazy to wrap our minds around (especially the Satanic one).
When you're on an airplane hurtling through the sky at 500mph, and you walk down the aisle to the lavatory, do you feel like you're traveling 500mph? No. This is basic relativity.
If we are spinning this fast, airplane trips going against the direction of the spin should take longer or be impossible.
If you're on an airplane going 500mph, and you stand in the aisle and jump straight up, do you smash into the back of the airplane? No. Because when you lifted off, you were already going 500mph. Same with airplanes that take off and travel - they are already traveling at the same relative speed as the Earth.
The sun is 93,000,000 miles away. Sunlight travels this far no problem to heat some areas to well over 100 degrees faranheit, but are unable to go an extra couple thousand miles to heat places which are freezing cold.
There are quite a few more factors to account for the temperature of a certain place on Earth than just how many or how few photons hit it.
Curvature is not accounted for when building roads, railroads, canals, bridges, etc.
The curvature is so gradual as to be rounded off. If you measure something, and it's exactly 18.000000002 meters long, you can safely drop the .000000002.
Air bubbles in space.
Not sure what you're talking about here but yes, molecules of hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, etc floating around in a vacuum will attract one another and make a "bubble". We refer to this phenomenon as "gravity".
The moon landing was faked.
Even if it were, that doesn't prove or disprove a flat earth.
Antarctica is not allowed to be conquered by countries or visited privately without permission.
This is not evidence of a flat or otherwise earth.
The UN logo and others are a picture of the Flat Earth.
Globalists don't want to offend those in the southern hemisphere. How would you propose displaying a 3D projection onto a 2D surface?
Antarctica is actually the ice wall.
Opinion, not evidence.
Operation Fishbowl was the military trying to crack the firmament.
Proof?
The Bible and lots of ancient people knew that we live under a dome.
And when I was a child, I thought chocolate milk came from brown cows. Your point?
Localized hotspots in the clouds, shown by pictures taken from hot air balloons.
Yep,parts of clouds closer to the sun get hotter.
The sun doesn't set, what you are seeing is a trick played on our eyes helped by the limits of our own sight.
You flat earthers always start off with seemingly reasonable points, then you devolve into using opinions as facts. Stop doing that.
The sun is way way bigger than the moon, right? But the distance just so happens to be the perfect amount for eclipses to happen (no, they are the same size as each other and close to us).
How does this imply a flat earth?
We only ever see one side of the moon.
Because it's tidally locked.
When the moon is not full you can literally see through part of it.
This is called gravitational lensing. It's pretty simple science.
All of the stars rotate perfectly around Polaris, the North Star.
And if the Earth's axis was pointed at Betelgeuse, then Betelgeuse would be the North Star. What's your point?
But I'm inside of a plane, not hanging onto it on the outside like an Afghan.
Air bubbles in space is the phenomenon that happens when liars are caught filimg their shit underwater. Also look into the cables they use to fool people into thinking they're floating around and doing backflips.
They could use literally anything else but a FE map if they wanted to, but they have to continue to put all of their trickery right in our faces.
How is that silly? Its perspective.
It implies FE because they're lying about the size and distance of the sun and moon, two objects which are important to the discussion at hand.
I know about tidal lock and the idea is way more ridiculous than FE.
Gravity is pretty much a hoax and Newton the perpetrator. Dont tell me you believe that bullshit about an apple falling on his head. He was a grown man, he'd never seen anything fall before that point in time? Lol.
My point is it wouldnt be perfect circle patterns if we're really flying around at 66,600 MPH while expanding at a rate of 500,000 MPH on top of the spinning. Jesus, even typing these numbers is like "wtf" lol. Come on.
When you're on an airplane hurtling through the sky at 500mph, and you walk down the aisle to the lavatory, do you feel like you're traveling 500mph? No. This is basic relativity.
If you're on an airplane going 500mph, and you stand in the aisle and jump straight up, do you smash into the back of the airplane? No. Because when you lifted off, you were already going 500mph. Same with airplanes that take off and travel - they are already traveling at the same relative speed as the Earth.
There are quite a few more factors to account for the temperature of a certain place on Earth than just how many or how few photons hit it.
The curvature is so gradual as to be rounded off. If you measure something, and it's exactly 18.000000002 meters long, you can safely drop the .000000002.
Not sure what you're talking about here but yes, molecules of hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, etc floating around in a vacuum will attract one another and make a "bubble". We refer to this phenomenon as "gravity".
Even if it were, that doesn't prove or disprove a flat earth.
This is not evidence of a flat or otherwise earth.
Globalists don't want to offend those in the southern hemisphere. How would you propose displaying a 3D projection onto a 2D surface?
Opinion, not evidence.
Proof?
And when I was a child, I thought chocolate milk came from brown cows. Your point?
Yep,parts of clouds closer to the sun get hotter.
You flat earthers always start off with seemingly reasonable points, then you devolve into using opinions as facts. Stop doing that.
How does this imply a flat earth?
Because it's tidally locked.
This is called gravitational lensing. It's pretty simple science.
And if the Earth's axis was pointed at Betelgeuse, then Betelgeuse would be the North Star. What's your point?
But I'm inside of a plane, not hanging onto it on the outside like an Afghan.
Air bubbles in space is the phenomenon that happens when liars are caught filimg their shit underwater. Also look into the cables they use to fool people into thinking they're floating around and doing backflips.
They could use literally anything else but a FE map if they wanted to, but they have to continue to put all of their trickery right in our faces.
How is that silly? Its perspective.
It implies FE because they're lying about the size and distance of the sun and moon, two objects which are important to the discussion at hand.
I know about tidal lock and the idea is way more ridiculous than FE.
Gravity is pretty much a hoax and Newton the perpetrator. Dont tell me you believe that bullshit about an apple falling on his head. He was a grown man, he'd never seen anything fall before that point in time? Lol.
My point is it wouldnt be perfect circle patterns if we're really flying around at 66,600 MPH while expanding at a rate of 500,000 MPH on top of the spinning. Jesus, even typing these numbers is like "wtf" lol. Come on.
As they say, you can lead an idiot to water but you can’t make them think. Enjoy your Mac and chesse.
Members of this forum with brains are a good sight to see. Thank you for aiding in putting the crazies in their place.