141 That's a hard NO! Some things just don't need further explanation. (media.greatawakening.win) posted 3 years ago by Retaining_H2O 3 years ago by Retaining_H2O +141 / -0 3 comments download share 3 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Did she? Had she veto right over these « Constitutional Kingdom » thing? Just asking as seriously as possible.
Even if she had absolutely forbidden it, Baby Castro would have gleefully insisted on it, as he was making too much money. The leaders of the world, especially of the Commonwealth and the British ex-PM, are incredibly evil in their own rights.
Lol