Lineage is correct on it, account only has like 10 posts, probably no followers until today. Raw post number is also correctly in line with the others, if it was posted today it would be >1567611244772790272 (some random Ron DeSantis post from September 7th)
So in those senses it's legit.
That being said, Twitter probably has lots of holes that haven't been filled. As someone whose youth was spent finding flaws in peer to peer and client server communications, I'm skeptical it's a legit post, instead probably someone that either has access to the database or found a sploit in the protocol. People commenting through the months, or posts about the subject matter would easily destroy that narrative which don't exist. That's my steelman for the legitimacy argument, hax.
Run a bot that will tweet "The Queen will die on [date]" thousands of times, each with a different date counting several years ahead (doesn't need to be infinite, she won't live for hundreds of years so 10-15 years will do)
When she eventually does die, have the bot delete all the other wrong dates and just leave the right one then put the profile on public.
People won't find the deleted tweets because it was set to private before. Hence they will yhink it's legit.
Sit back and have fun! People will be trying to decipher your other random made-up criptic bullshit tweets and you can secretly laugh at them.
Yeah, I actually thought a bit more on it and saw something similar posted to the top of this thread as well. I don't know if there's a way to manually look up a tweet using the global unique postid that's at the end of the tweet. The amount of coding behind that would be pretty immense, but once it's done I'm sure it's well worth the initial time invested to people that are in it for monetary reasons.
I also recall Elon posting about adding an edit function, so wouldn't surprise me either if there was some beta/alpha testing of that.
Lineage is correct on it, account only has like 10 posts, probably no followers until today. Raw post number is also correctly in line with the others, if it was posted today it would be >1567611244772790272 (some random Ron DeSantis post from September 7th)
So in those senses it's legit.
That being said, Twitter probably has lots of holes that haven't been filled. As someone whose youth was spent finding flaws in peer to peer and client server communications, I'm skeptical it's a legit post, instead probably someone that either has access to the database or found a sploit in the protocol. People commenting through the months, or posts about the subject matter would easily destroy that narrative which don't exist. That's my steelman for the legitimacy argument, hax.
It's a standard twitter troll with a standard twitter prank
This👆🏻
Yeah, I actually thought a bit more on it and saw something similar posted to the top of this thread as well. I don't know if there's a way to manually look up a tweet using the global unique postid that's at the end of the tweet. The amount of coding behind that would be pretty immense, but once it's done I'm sure it's well worth the initial time invested to people that are in it for monetary reasons.
I also recall Elon posting about adding an edit function, so wouldn't surprise me either if there was some beta/alpha testing of that.
You don't really need either of those things when following the steps I outlined.