Clearly, you didn't read past the first line of my post. That's alright. The sooner you realize the group of pedophiles who pushed circumcision for generations are the same group of pedophiles who are currently pushing the hyper sexualization and sex changes in children today, the sooner you'll find that all of these practices lead back to a Sabbatean origin.
Or you can continue being an apologist for barbaric ancient practices which involve an adult male sucking blood off of a baby's genitals.
The question is, what amount of genital mutilation is acceptable for children? I'd say none at all. Any slight alteration opens the doors to more extreme and dangerous procedures.
Clearly, you didn't read past the first line of my post. That's alright. The sooner you realize the group of pedophiles who pushed circumcision for generations are the same group of pedophiles who are currently pushing the hyper sexualization and sex changes in children today, the sooner you'll find that all of these practices lead back to a Sabbatean origin.
Or you can continue being an apologist for barbaric ancient practices which involve an adult male sucking blood off of a baby's genitals.
The question is, what amount of genital mutilation is acceptable for children? I'd say none at all. Any slight alteration opens the doors to more extreme and dangerous procedures.
She wasn’t being an apologist, she just said it’s different.