Yeah, it was totally an Airplane... For sure.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (104)
sorted by:
-Not as long as the burning plane and burning debris.
-Does it matter once it got going?
-Gee, lets not look for possible explanations.
-It didn't freefall. It took 11 seconds to collapse from 1368ft, not 9.2 seconds.
-What is thermite composed of? Why wouldn't a sky scrapper contain the same elements? What makes a university professor back then more credible than university professors today?
Was the WTC designed to support 10 upper floors buckling like this? https://imgur.com/a/CxjxUmN
-The burning aluminum plane. Gotcha -What difference, at this point, does it make? -The 9/11 commission sure didn't -Let's set the time aside. With the plane allegedly damaging the structure on one side, why didn't it fall sideways instead of straight down? -So, your hypothesis is that thermite spontaneously formed as the towers were collapsing? What person who did materials analysis claimed there wasn't thermite or that it's presence was explainable by your hypothesis? -Irrelevant, there was no resistance beneath it
Aluminum/magnesium/plastics/Rubber etc etc. The impacted area basically became a raging furnace.
"why didn't it fall sideways instead of straight down?"
Because the floors above buckled and fell downward. Why would it fall sideways? It's not a fucking tree. Do you not know how physics work?
"your hypothesis is that thermite spontaneously formed"
I didn't say thermite spontaneously formed. I'm saying Niels Harrit is a fucking grifter if not a CIA plant to distract you from how the hijackers even got in to the country in the first place.