Every member of the Church of Climatology suddenly goes stupid when you bring up the OBVIOUS fact that climate "science" fails to account for astronomical data that proves conclusions of man's influence are most of the time, bunk.
Man does have some impact in small areas when we change the landscape of certain places, but this nonsense that CO2 causes wildfires has always been bullshit. Plants absorb CO2. If anything, more CO2 for them to absorb would lead to a greener world. Of course... that means leaving some trees and plants to do the absorbing.
CO2 is heavier than air. That's why it's used to displace O2 from some types of fires thus ending combustion, for at least a while.
How low would a person's IQ have to be to associate any level of CO2 causing wildfires?
While I'm on ...
New York has been under a mile of ice; back then, CO2 concentration was much higher than today's ~412 ppmV, There were no people, planes, trains, automobiles or diesel ships, yet, the ice retreated northward. CO2 is irrelevant - unless there's not enough of it.
Lastly ...
Think big picture. If excess heat couldn't be dumped from Earth to space, land would look like an ashtray.
Excess heat can't be conducted nor convected to space, as there is (virtually) no cooperating medium. The only way to dump excess heat to space is via the same method by which it arrived - radiation. CO2 is one of the atmosphere's radiative gases - water vapor being by far the most prevalent;
Every member of the Church of Climatology suddenly goes stupid when you bring up the OBVIOUS fact that climate "science" fails to account for astronomical data that proves conclusions of man's influence are most of the time, bunk.
Man does have some impact in small areas when we change the landscape of certain places, but this nonsense that CO2 causes wildfires has always been bullshit. Plants absorb CO2. If anything, more CO2 for them to absorb would lead to a greener world. Of course... that means leaving some trees and plants to do the absorbing.
CO2 is heavier than air. That's why it's used to displace O2 from some types of fires thus ending combustion, for at least a while.
How low would a person's IQ have to be to associate any level of CO2 causing wildfires?
While I'm on ...
New York has been under a mile of ice; back then, CO2 concentration was much higher than today's ~412 ppmV, There were no people, planes, trains, automobiles or diesel ships, yet, the ice retreated northward. CO2 is irrelevant - unless there's not enough of it.
Lastly ...
Think big picture. If excess heat couldn't be dumped from Earth to space, land would look like an ashtray.
Excess heat can't be conducted nor convected to space, as there is (virtually) no cooperating medium. The only way to dump excess heat to space is via the same method by which it arrived - radiation. CO2 is one of the atmosphere's radiative gases - water vapor being by far the most prevalent;
CO2 and all radiative gases are natural coolants.
QED