9/11 truth isn’t gonna go away until it is revealed …
That’s some neatly cut steel you got there … 🧐
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (49)
sorted by:
Critical thought, people. If I'm a firefighter digging through that rubble and I have a beam swaying, say, 30 feet overhead, I'm sure gonna want that beam cut down so that I can work under it safely.
I'm open to the idea that 9/11 is not as advertised, but posts like this make us all look stupid.
I see applying logic is getting downvotes. Please, oh please, do not take away my fake internet points.
Does it look like that beam was 'swaying' overhead??... All the beams I've seen cut at that angle were Vertical ...None were 'swaying"... You are quite entitled to your opinion but please don't insult my/our intelligence...
Nearly every single beam has been cut Horizontily bar a few...Go look at any of the hundreds of photos of ground zero after the collapse...
I don't need to insult anyone's intelligence, it generally speaks for itself.
If I'm a guy with a torch trying to improve the safety of the area and I want to make the structurally unsound beam fall in a specific controlled direction, that's exactly how I would cut it. Perhaps other beams were in a position to be lifted instead and so a horizontal cut made more sense.
I guarantee if that beam had been cut dozens of stories up and then fallen into that position, there wouldn't be any slag stuck to it. That stuff can be knocked off with a hammer (I have some experience in this area), it would never survive forces that can pulverize concrete, and it certainly wouldn't be clean, it would be covered with dust and rust like everything else even if it had survived the fall.
No, that beam was cut where it stood. Using this photo as evidence of 9/11 malfeasance does nothing but undermine the position because the visual is easily understood by anybody who knows what they're talking about. Critical thinking and some real-world understanding are what I'm arguing for here.
To be fair - we don't know where that beam came from. It could have been ground level, which means it would retain slag. Also, I think the workers were more interested in heavy duty excavation - not finesse work.
Not beating you up or anything. Just laying it out there.
It makes sense to me to think that the first priority was the safety of the rescuers picking their way through the rubble. With hundreds of tons of pick-up sticks stacked precariously above and the hope of survivors underneath, finesse work is exactly what would have been called for.
Also, note the lack of rust on the slag and the cut. If that cut had been done before the collapse, they would have been sprayed with water like everything else and would have rusted like everything else. But they are clean. That cut was made after the area was deluged.