6
anon82059 6 points ago +6 / -0

Brian's overthinking this. Yes, they were told in advance to evacuate because Trump didn't want civilian casualties. No, the planes were not let in, Israel had defeated their air defenses and stealth bombers were used.

0
anon82059 0 points ago +1 / -1

I don't think 'it's all Jews/KM' is the argument. KM are in control, but they have all sorts of middle managers who act as their lightning rods. These people don't have to share the same ideology or ethnicity, they just have to be compromised.

4
anon82059 4 points ago +5 / -1

Your argument hinges on the idea that the Khazarian Mafia and the Soros/Rothschild/Rockefeller etc. crowd are different. I don't see the distinction. As I see it, Khazarian Mafia is simply a label to describe [Them].

1
anon82059 1 point ago +1 / -0

Your approach would leave the Great Awakening rudderless. Leadership is key. You may call them "influencers" but that's the role they play. Like it or not, that's how humans work. It's up to us to discern good leaders, but your blanket approach would stall the movement as surely as infiltrators.

The point remains that you don't know Sather's work well enough to stand in judgement of it with any credibility. I don't particularly TRUST anybody, but Sather is among those whom I've found the least reason to distrust.

1
anon82059 1 point ago +2 / -1
  1. Why so angry?
  2. How do your arguments in any way nullify the advice given in the article?
  3. If you actually knew about Sather, you'd know your UFO bullshit is bullshit. Sather thinks they're generally advanced military tech, not extraterrestrials.

Jordan Sather is among the least "fruitcakey" influencers out there.

4
anon82059 4 points ago +4 / -0

I don't get that vibe from him at all. I'd point out that he's exposed a bunch of infiltrators such as Charlie Ward and Simon Parks.

6
anon82059 6 points ago +6 / -0

I appreciate his skepticism. He has pulled me out of several rabbit holes.

2
anon82059 2 points ago +2 / -0

The problem I see is that to fully understand the import of the Q drops, you have to be introduced to the ideas of human trafficking, Satanism, and child abuse. Those aren't topics for school-aged kids.

3
anon82059 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'd guess that forecast is based on a statistical regression of recent data. That method wouldn't catch changes in supply and demand.

2
anon82059 2 points ago +2 / -0

I never understood the reason for cyberattacks. What do they think they're destabilizing? So X will be down for a bit. How does that impact geopolitics, or really anything at all other than some techs that have to work overtime?

2
anon82059 2 points ago +2 / -0

Graham's up for reelection next year. He always gets good around this time in the election cycle.

9
anon82059 9 points ago +9 / -0

This is clearly a satire article.

5
anon82059 5 points ago +5 / -0

It would be great if true, but I can't find any official confirmation of this. Highly suspect it's a false rumor.

1
anon82059 1 point ago +2 / -1

Be very cautious. Absolutely learn the topic, but this is the time in the cycle where newbies join in due to the hype and then inevitably get crushed when the bubble pops.

My advice to you is to study and learn, maybe invest a couple hundred bucks that you can afford to lose in the name of experience, but do NOT put large amounts in until the cycle has reset. If historical patterns repeat, that should be around summer '26.

If you let your FOMO take hold now, you will get caught up in the euphoria and you will lose money. Only veterans stand a chance at this stage in the cycle.

14
anon82059 14 points ago +14 / -0

Epic rant, but the guy is still a poser.

1
anon82059 1 point ago +1 / -0

I didn't hear "MAGA." The officer said, "Woah, back up." Unfortunately it obscured whatever was supposedly out of touch.

2
anon82059 2 points ago +2 / -0

Beautiful work, thanks for posting it!

view more: Next ›