I tried telling my father about the twin towers and he started going off as if he knew how structures collapse. He had a tone of talking down to me saying "The fuel weakens the steal, do you know that?" I was like uhh yeah I understand how heat makes steel weaker.
He wouldn't listen to a damn word I said. He just kept repeating that the weight of the floors above would cause each level to fall down. I kept saying yeah so why didn't they fall to the side at all? Why did it look like a controlled demolition?
I want a short maybe 10 minute video by an expert explaining how this could not occur unless it was a controlled demolition.
Equal and opposite forces. As the upper floors "crushed down", the lower floors "crush up" as they each destroy one another. At best, if 30 floors crushed down then the lower 30 floors would crush up. That would be 60 floors of destruction.
It's worth nothing that the lower the floor, the stronger and more sturdy was the steel and concrete that it was comprised of, as it had to be able to be load bearing for the 10/20/30/40/50/60/70/80/90/100 floors above it. So the upper 30 floors would be the WEAKEST structurally.
It's just like the classic scenario of the semi truck smashing into a Volkswagen Beetle. While the Beetle gets demolished, it used its force to damage the semi.
Depending on which tower, which were hit at different floors, the most damage it could do, assuming all else equal, is destroy the equivalent number of floors.
Anyway, it's basic physics and any legit physicist agrees this is the case.
Fire had absolutely nothing to do with anything. He can watch any number of AE911Truth's videos which parade dozens of engineers, physicists and architects across the screen who say no fire could have ever been hot enough to melt any of the steel. In short, you need a FOUNDRY to melt steel.