Howd they convince those steel beams throughout the entire building to all shrink within the same 10 seconds? And thrice on one day and never before or again after ?
The change in crystalline structure doesn't require ALL of the steel beams to buckle at the same time. If you have a single 8 ft section of beam, that decides to become a 4 ft section of beam; it will pull the floor above it down. When you have an area about the size of a 747 all burning, you have sufficient heat to affect the central pillars. Then you start a pancake collapse.
The location of the impact, was designed for precisely this type of failure. Too high, and you don't have sufficient mass to create the pancake failures, too low and the impact will not begin the chain reaction.
Based on your 'pancake' theory I should be able to stand a school bus on end and drop a Volkswagen bug from say 10/20 feet above the front of the bus from the top end. What I should witness is the bug 'pancake' the bus all the way to the bottom end or ie, completely flattened the bus top to bottom. I sincerely hope you have nothing to do with civil engineering.
Good grief. Your knowledge of physics is matched my your understanding of crystalline structures. When you collapse a pancake cement layer structure, the potential energy above the failure point, cascades into the surfaces below the failure point, with more energy than the original failure. Have you never see. A controlled demolition? Ever wonder why they simply don’t blow out the bottom level?
So you are saying the twin towers were destroyed via controlled demolition. Got it. No need to keep droning on about muh crystalline structures and other crap you have zero understanding of.
Howd they convince those steel beams throughout the entire building to all shrink within the same 10 seconds? And thrice on one day and never before or again after ?
The change in crystalline structure doesn't require ALL of the steel beams to buckle at the same time. If you have a single 8 ft section of beam, that decides to become a 4 ft section of beam; it will pull the floor above it down. When you have an area about the size of a 747 all burning, you have sufficient heat to affect the central pillars. Then you start a pancake collapse.
The location of the impact, was designed for precisely this type of failure. Too high, and you don't have sufficient mass to create the pancake failures, too low and the impact will not begin the chain reaction.
Based on your 'pancake' theory I should be able to stand a school bus on end and drop a Volkswagen bug from say 10/20 feet above the front of the bus from the top end. What I should witness is the bug 'pancake' the bus all the way to the bottom end or ie, completely flattened the bus top to bottom. I sincerely hope you have nothing to do with civil engineering.
Good grief. Your knowledge of physics is matched my your understanding of crystalline structures. When you collapse a pancake cement layer structure, the potential energy above the failure point, cascades into the surfaces below the failure point, with more energy than the original failure. Have you never see. A controlled demolition? Ever wonder why they simply don’t blow out the bottom level?
So you are saying the twin towers were destroyed via controlled demolition. Got it. No need to keep droning on about muh crystalline structures and other crap you have zero understanding of.