Higher Quality Posts Wanted
Garbage IN, Garbage OUT!
- I have seen several posts which end up being false stories or disinformation, many of which end up being shared with others (such as family members) only to have to walk back their posts once they realize the posts were based on fake stories. This makes it harder to wake normies up.
- To help reduce the proliferation of disinformation, if you are creating a post please verify that what you are posting is accurate in its entirety.
- For example, if you want to post an image of a Twitter message instead of the Twitter link, verify that the post actually exists. It may be worth adding the link into a comment or an archived link in case people would like to also verify.
- Here is an actual example: https://greatawakening.win/p/15JUCeprCJ/got-your-coffee-walk-up-to-the-l/ While the image is real, the example thumbnails are not real. Either mark it a shitpost or perhaps we could post this with a new flair of "Disinformation Alert" or something.
- Let's work to make this community better, by being more accurate with what is and what is not for entertainment, and what is actually accurate enough to share with normies.
As a history buff, I would love this. I was at one point creating a history website. Maybe I can instead start posting history. Maybe I should make a separate username for it. If i did what should my username be?
Here I am
I made Robert_E_Reeeee and tried to post but i think it will take time for my handshake to actually be able to post
hehe thank you for the suggestion
Robert E Reeeee Is amazing.
Sherlock History? Time Revisitor? There's a historical theorist, Anatoly Tomenko, who maintains that the only history we can rely on is astronomical observations. Pretty stringent, but safe. However, we have over 4000 years of literacy here and there through the world, I think we could triangulate toward the truth a lot better than some of the things that get posted here.
Unfortunately, my deeper understanding of history only really pertains to American history. I think I am a good stepping stone for Normies though as all of my histories, contradict the left's perverse version of history yet is backed by the library of congress archives.
Well, I like ancient history, which is so fragmentary, but it doesn't matter, every story has an origin and people posting about it could say whether they read it in a book or saw it on TV or heard about it from their grandmother's best friend instead of presenting something as fiat truth, then readers can dig as they do on anything else. :) and may I add, here you go, with "the left's perverse version" as I said, opinion rules. They think your version is perverse. Why does this happen? Some of these debates are open to logic and some just aren't. Perhaps the problem is that people can't empathize with the past enough to value systems based on different premises. Example, Isis and the Taliban blowing up the last remnants of vanished cultures because they weren't Islamic, or all the wokeness cancelling the Civil War relics. Yet history definitely has repetitive patterns and lessons for the ages.
I understand your sentiment and I think that the method plays into the two-party paradigm. I do feel that there is an underlying evil that infiltrates all parties and systems, and I will back each data point up with some sort of quality evidence.