PSA: As GEOTUS directs more attention on our movement, our memes, and your research, their disruption campaigns will intensify! Many of you are getting tagged and heckled on a daily basis, now. Do we give a $#!+? Nope! DO IT, Q+! YOUR DIGITAL SOLDIERS ARE READY!
(media.greatawakening.win)
🚨 ANNOUNCEMENT 🚨
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (54)
sorted by:
I would ALWAYS choose the A-10 but I'm a biased prior Air Force guy. Computer Security - not flying - but A-10s were at my first base. Loved to watch them, and they would "sneak up on you" if they happened to see you walking the road by the flightline. They can be really quiet when they want to.
People saying the F-35 could replace the A-10 really chafe my britches.
It's fucking retarded. The A-10 is astonishingly perfect for what it does - and ridiculously survivable like can make it home with half its wings missing - the F-35 is is piece of jack of all trades master of none piece of flying shit.
And stone the bloody crows for cutting off the F-22 vastly prematurely. They can't even make more - while we can still build obsolete F-16s for Greece or whoever the else fuck wants them.
Edit: It does occur to me, if WH are in control, perhaps we don't need the full allotment of F-22s. Never thought about it that way before.
In Japan this week and F-35 was written off, that's right, 76 million dollars, after a bird strike
Niiice...how the hell does that write off the entire plane? Structural damage to carbon I'm guessing, can't be spliced in?
It would really chafe their's as well if they tried to do the same stuff at the same speed and altitude, and without the titanium bathtub to protect their britches.