That is a fair point, and an indicator that will work N times. The only issue I take with this, is that a rule is created based on an entity that can adapt.
If anything, if the FBI lurks here, they do get a lot of data in terms of developing strategies to gain control over the narrative that is spinning out of control.
Not to stray off topic here, I guess I would suggest to be careful to not create confirmation bias based on an entity that is known to adapt to shape and re-gain control over narratives.
Letting the FBI be your gatekeeper for who to trust or not, really?
Seems to be a good indicator.
That is a fair point, and an indicator that will work N times. The only issue I take with this, is that a rule is created based on an entity that can adapt.
If anything, if the FBI lurks here, they do get a lot of data in terms of developing strategies to gain control over the narrative that is spinning out of control.
Not to stray off topic here, I guess I would suggest to be careful to not create confirmation bias based on an entity that is known to adapt to shape and re-gain control over narratives.
Duly noted.