The bridge is facetious I assume, it's not the same situation.
I did watch the 9/11 whistleblowers video, one of the people featured worked for UL who originally certified the steel in the towers. The claim made there was that the certification should have prevented the weakening required for longer than the time that it took to collapse. It's worth watching, it has a lot of good info.
So at least according to that, either the steel was not matching the certification, the certification missed some aspect that allowed the failure, or something else was involved that is not part of the official story.
The idea of a controlled demolition of the towers does seem highly improbable and difficult to undertake. Although there were stories about some unusual "renovations" that had been going on that could have provided some cover for something along these lines.
One thing about the jet fuel - it seems likely to me that it would have flowed into the core and all the various shafts that connect down to lower levels? In fact I thought that was the official theory of what happened. But that would divert the fuel for the fire to other locations than the floors where the planes hit, where it appeared to begin collapsing.
I think I can get behind the idea that "I don't know anything for certain anymore"!
No probs. I believe the unusual renovations were building 7. As for the steel, the steel in our nuclear submarines has been fucked with and the "grade" is insufficient so the steel in the WTC being less the the full bottle is well within the realms of possibility.
You have raised some good points, like the fuel making it's way down shafts and stair wells.
One thing I am sick of is people (like OP) comparing it to situations that are completely different like the bridge in question. (facetious or not, cause you can never tell)
The idea of a controlled demo that is conducted with nobody noticing, is on the surface of it, utterly fucking preposterous.
Re renovations i remember years ago seeing some stuff about some art group that had access to lots of parts of the building and i thought there were renovations or something as well, in the towers.
Re. the fuel, I would imagine there would be huge gaping holes into the elevator shafts and service plenums that go down at least as far as the express levels 1/3 of the way down the building.
But it may be that we never know exactly what happened there, since most of the evidence has been destroyed by this point.
Thanks for the detailed answer!
The bridge is facetious I assume, it's not the same situation.
I did watch the 9/11 whistleblowers video, one of the people featured worked for UL who originally certified the steel in the towers. The claim made there was that the certification should have prevented the weakening required for longer than the time that it took to collapse. It's worth watching, it has a lot of good info.
https://odysee.com/@ConspiraciesFromCatholicPerpective:2/911-Whistleblowers-(FULL-DOCUMENTARY-2019):7
So at least according to that, either the steel was not matching the certification, the certification missed some aspect that allowed the failure, or something else was involved that is not part of the official story.
The idea of a controlled demolition of the towers does seem highly improbable and difficult to undertake. Although there were stories about some unusual "renovations" that had been going on that could have provided some cover for something along these lines.
One thing about the jet fuel - it seems likely to me that it would have flowed into the core and all the various shafts that connect down to lower levels? In fact I thought that was the official theory of what happened. But that would divert the fuel for the fire to other locations than the floors where the planes hit, where it appeared to begin collapsing.
I think I can get behind the idea that "I don't know anything for certain anymore"!
Appreciate the response!
No probs. I believe the unusual renovations were building 7. As for the steel, the steel in our nuclear submarines has been fucked with and the "grade" is insufficient so the steel in the WTC being less the the full bottle is well within the realms of possibility.
You have raised some good points, like the fuel making it's way down shafts and stair wells.
One thing I am sick of is people (like OP) comparing it to situations that are completely different like the bridge in question. (facetious or not, cause you can never tell)
The idea of a controlled demo that is conducted with nobody noticing, is on the surface of it, utterly fucking preposterous.
Building 7 on the other hand ?
Re renovations i remember years ago seeing some stuff about some art group that had access to lots of parts of the building and i thought there were renovations or something as well, in the towers.
Re. the fuel, I would imagine there would be huge gaping holes into the elevator shafts and service plenums that go down at least as far as the express levels 1/3 of the way down the building.
But it may be that we never know exactly what happened there, since most of the evidence has been destroyed by this point.
and then there's building 7 ;)