US Corporation Theory - The Great Awakening - Where We Go Qne, We Go All!

US Corporation Theory 🧐 Research Wanted 🤔

posted 2 years ago by biggj2k3 2 years ago by biggj2k3 +255 / -0

This is my first time posting, so please forgive any formatting issues. TLDR to start because your time is valuable, and this is a long post.

TLDR: I have seen no evidence to support that the US is a corporation. I have seen two main forms of proof, which I dispute below. Straight forward enough?

I am posting to address a theory that circulates on here every so often. I refer to what I will call the US Corporation theory. I don’t know if supporters have a different name for it, so apologies if it has a better name.

I may be mistaken, but I have also taken the US Corporation theory to include the Sovereign Citizen movement. I do this because when they quote law, they use similar references. Also, there is a lot of overlap between the two. Please correct me in the comments if these are independent and should be treated differently.

I was inspired to post by a video link posted in the comments here today. I am not linking to the comment, or the post they commented on because I am not “calling out” the poster, or insinuating that they glow like Chernobyl. I am assuming they are good folk, and not a clown.

I also want to say the video has some good info, just definitely not what I write about below. The link was to the following video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XHl4j5xF-Js&t=12s&ab_channel=RageAgainstNWO

The video made two claims in particular that stood out to me. First, that the United States became a corporation under the Organic Act of 1871. Link to the current Federal Code, 28 U.S.C. 3002, which incorporates the Act of 1781, below:

https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCODE-2015-title28/USCODE-2015-title28-partVI-chap176-subchapA-sec3002

The theory points to 28 U.S.C. 3002 Section 15. I am skipping Sections (1) through (14) here. You can find them at the link above.:

Definitions

As used in this chapter:

…

(15) "United States" means—

(A) a Federal corporation; (B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or (C) an instrumentality of the United States.

Here’s the problem with interpreting United States means a Federal Corporation. See that part right at the beginning that says: “As used in this chapter”? Those are the definitions for this chapter. Not always, and not everywhere in the US Code – only for this chapter.

Second, that the Paris Peace Treaty of 1783 confirms that the US was and is a British colony:

https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/treaty-of-paris

You can scroll down to see a transcript of the document. The following is the part that I think the video refers to, very first paragraph:

“It having pleased the Divine Providence to dispose the Hearts of the most Serene and most Potent Prince George the Third, by the Grace of God, King of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, Defender of the Faith, Duke of Brunswick and Lunebourg, Arch- Treasurer and Prince Elector of the Holy Roman Empire etc.. and of the United States of America, to forget all past Misunderstandings and Differences that have unhappily interrupted the good Correspondence and Friendship which they mutually wish to restore;”

The above reads as if the King of England is referred to as King or Price Elector of the United States. Keep in mind that this also says he is King of France, a country he was actively at war with, and who aided us in the Revolutionary War.

Next, go to Article 1 of the document:

“His Brittanic Majesty acknowledges the said United States, viz., New Hampshire, Massachusetts Bay, Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia, to be free sovereign and Independent States; that he treats with them as such, and for himself his Heirs & Successors, relinquishes all claims to the Government, Propriety, and Territorial Rights of the same and every Part thereof.

Since I can’t format on this site for shit, let me just put some emphasis of my own:

His Brittanic Majesty

acknowledges

the said Unites States

to be free and sovereign Independent States

and for himself his Heirs & Successors

relinquishes all claims to the Government, Propriety and Territorial Rights of the Same and every Part thereof.

I think that wraps up the French Treaty part of the theory.

Please feel free to send me something else to look up for this. Give me legal citations to check. If you genuinely believe the US is a corporation, I truly want to look at your sources.

I am not a lawyer, but I do work in legal. I am passionate about the law, and I do not appreciate when people claim the law says one thing when it really says something else. That’s what Demonrats do.

135 comments

135 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (135)

sorted by:

▲ 13 ▼

– Space_Monkey 13 points 2 years ago +14 / -1

Here is a book that discusses the UCC and its origin: https://files.catbox.moe/bucwyk.pdf

Here is an excerpt from the intro:

The whole thing started obviously when we had 13 signers to an Original Declaration of Independence. That was an underlying contract that was signed by thirteen different leaders that said "No More." "We are done, we are independent from you. We are going to rule ourselves" And that contract led up to another one which is known as the Constitution and another The Bill of Rights the Articles of the Confederation etc., etc. etc

These contracts are what formed a nation here over 200 hundred years ago. It was formed under contract and Sub-formed under codes, rules and regulations. In 1871 the United States created Act that was called the District of Columbia Organic Act. At that point in time there was only a government and a people, individually based upon the contracts that were written almost a hundred years prior to The Constitution, the Articles of Confederation, etc. etc....

This new act, called the District of Columbia Organic Act created the first Corporate Government that the United States of America has ever seen, and it created a new Corporation that most people don't see let alone believe. Because it's Corporate America, it has everything to do with commerce; it's under Contract Law. Shortly thereafter, they created what is known as the Bureau of Vital Statistics. The Bureau of Vital Statistics is what formed a birth certificate/Certificate of Title/Chattel paper. With the help of the 14th Amendment and the newly created Bureau of Vital Statistics this birth certificate is what created the first ever in America Corporate person known as a straw-man, a juristic person or any other kind of fictitious corporation that you can put in your mind and just think about, it is a fiction, A third party front, a dummy. It is not you it is a word that reflects the Certificate of title/chattel paper. It's a contract.

These contracts enabled the Corporate United States to contract with a Corporate us. What people have to understand is how they incorporated themselves. They see that one of the biggest problems with some of past or even present information that's out there is a lot of people want to go back to the law. Well, under these contracts that we're speaking of, you became a surety. The surety was responsible to pay for this entire Corporation's new existence such as the Federal Reserve, such as the IRS, such as the Social Security Administration. I hope that everyone out there understands why this corporation is starting to exist and how it came about and how they get to us. They don't deal with us they deal with our juristic person. The fictional you. Your Driver's license, your social security card, most all bills that you get, most anything you get will have your juristic person’s name, it's the commerce created by birth certificate and the 14th amendment citizen name. It is a created US citizen you, not the real flesh and blood you. It is your front.

When they started to contract and they switched over our gold, which was in 1933, they took all of the gold and they started using a paper currency. Which is a Federal Reserve Note (FRN), the dollar bills that we carry around. When they created that new little creature the Corporate America was free to use as much of this paper currency it wanted to. It didn't have to use the gold and silver so it could just exchange promises from one hand to another. Again, you have to sit back and understand that a Corporation is coming after you. There is no Mr. General Motors -- General Motors is nobody. It is just a fiction.

Consent is the largest issue in contract law. It's something that has worked in all levels; it works everywhere because it is the Law. Law is defined as a rule or regulation from a government to ITS citizens. When you look into a consensual encounter, or voluntary compliance, the first thing that happens when you get pulled over for instance, what happens to you? What do they do? What's the first thing they ask you for? "Can I see your driver’s license, registration?” or “Can I see your papers?" They are asking you to voluntarily give them their papers, agreements, so that they can charge you. Why? Because they OWN the contract and they can do that by your agreement to the contract. You signed that driver license correct? You paid for the license correct? You didn't know it, but you turned all your rights into certain privileges and you went in and asked them for it and paid them for it and they have the proof of it simply by seeing your STATE OF _______ DRIVER LICENSE.

If you are looking for a particular document that spells it all out with a government seal stamped on it, I don't think you will ever find it, but does that mean it's not true?

For me the only proof I needed was to look around and see just how much of what we think is "the law" is actually policy that gets enforced on people involuntarily. The only way this can be done legally is by the instruments of commercial law, which means it's all done through corporations. And since you can't mix real and fictitious entities in contracts, that means we have corporate entities too.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 5 ▼

– MemeToDeath2021 5 points 2 years ago +6 / -1

Per your comments about the FRN, note that these are DEBT NOTES, not money. So when you buy something with title like a car or house you CANNOT have the legal title, but only the equitable title (use only), because you never really "bought it" because debt notes are not Constitutional money per Article I, Section 10 of the 1788 Constitution. After they did this crap in 1933, we lost all of our property rights.