Would a world government be bad if they were just restricted to enforcing a US style constitution?
🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬
Obviously the thought of world governance brings up ideas of tyrants restricting liberties via socialism and communism. What if instead of these systems, a cooperative world government was in place whose only agreed upon role would be to strictly enforce a well written constitution, such as something like the US Constitution?
To me, the main problems would be voter fraud, a federal reserve type monetary system, big tech monopolies and also a sense of complacency amongst communities.
If by some magic (perhaps blockchain technologies) these problems could be fixed, I don't see how a world government, or a world constitution would be a bad thing.
I would love to know others thoughts about this
In that scenario a small city in China would have more say than the whole United States
My theoretical scenario would be that this world governments ONLY role would be to enforce the constitution. Countries would still elect their own leaders, but would be forced to adhere to this theoretical constitution.
I agree that separation of powers would work, in theory. It works with computer algorithms. The problem is people...
People can choose to ignore the rules.
Seems like more possibilities for corruption if we can’t handle it in this small country