Would a world government be bad if they were just restricted to enforcing a US style constitution?
🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬
Obviously the thought of world governance brings up ideas of tyrants restricting liberties via socialism and communism. What if instead of these systems, a cooperative world government was in place whose only agreed upon role would be to strictly enforce a well written constitution, such as something like the US Constitution?
To me, the main problems would be voter fraud, a federal reserve type monetary system, big tech monopolies and also a sense of complacency amongst communities.
If by some magic (perhaps blockchain technologies) these problems could be fixed, I don't see how a world government, or a world constitution would be a bad thing.
I would love to know others thoughts about this
Global government has one big problem: people can't leave. A binding, global govt deprives 8 billion people of the right to seek refuge if/when that govt becomes abusive.
Yes indeed, a constitution is an agreed upon contract. There would have to be clauses for violating the contract, and severe penalties.
If the enforcers of the contract/constitution were all corrupted, then a 'well armed populace' would be the only way to declare it null and void. Easy to understand why the cabal has worked for so long to disarm the world.