I disagree with this entirely as far as the nuclear aspect is concerned. Radiation does not equal nuclear detonation. Radiation more likely equals depleted uranium Warheads from the drones that were fashioned into bunker busting bombs.
There is no radiation emission from depleted uranium. In fact depleted uranium is specifically used, among other applications, as one of the best shielding materials for gamma radiation, but there is no radioactive emission from that material fyi.
Fair enough. Context and detail matter. Measurable or reportable levels of radiation in DU ar negligent to near not existent. I should have worded it differently. All radioactive isotopes and materials have some radiation emissions depending on specific activity and decay rate and half life. Anyway yes how I worded my response is patently false. Either way point I was making is DU in a weapon would not be the result of radiation levels as described.
Absolutely not. Very wrong interpretation, OWi. It's not just "radiation." It's the specific isotopes involved. I am not jumping you, but, even the phrase "depleted uranium warhead" shows an incredible amount of ignorance (and I'm not calling anyone "stupid," here), because that's exactly what "depleted" means. No fuel. Mostly inert. The extra neutrons needed to feed the nuclear fission reaction that drive the whole deal in the first place comes from U238 (normal uranium in nature is mostly U235, and is considered inert unless it's part of a tamper in the 2nd stage).
Read the presentation. The "radiation" isotopes found are literally fingerprints of putonium fuel. Uranium wouldn't produce cesium, for instance.
I disagree with this entirely as far as the nuclear aspect is concerned. Radiation does not equal nuclear detonation. Radiation more likely equals depleted uranium Warheads from the drones that were fashioned into bunker busting bombs.
There is no radiation emission from depleted uranium. In fact depleted uranium is specifically used, among other applications, as one of the best shielding materials for gamma radiation, but there is no radioactive emission from that material fyi.
That is patently false.
https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/opinions_layman/depleted-uranium/en/l-2/4.htm
Fair enough. Context and detail matter. Measurable or reportable levels of radiation in DU ar negligent to near not existent. I should have worded it differently. All radioactive isotopes and materials have some radiation emissions depending on specific activity and decay rate and half life. Anyway yes how I worded my response is patently false. Either way point I was making is DU in a weapon would not be the result of radiation levels as described.
Absolutely not. Very wrong interpretation, OWi. It's not just "radiation." It's the specific isotopes involved. I am not jumping you, but, even the phrase "depleted uranium warhead" shows an incredible amount of ignorance (and I'm not calling anyone "stupid," here), because that's exactly what "depleted" means. No fuel. Mostly inert. The extra neutrons needed to feed the nuclear fission reaction that drive the whole deal in the first place comes from U238 (normal uranium in nature is mostly U235, and is considered inert unless it's part of a tamper in the 2nd stage).
Read the presentation. The "radiation" isotopes found are literally fingerprints of putonium fuel. Uranium wouldn't produce cesium, for instance.
Standby, investigating.
Ya! It's such fascinating stuff. Pls see this comment:
https://greatawakening.win/p/15JmxKyP5U/x/c/4OdiBDdoGCH