Prove me wrong, as the saying goes. Since you don't know anything, there's nothing for you to enlighten me about. (And I don't know "Zuby" from a brain-eating zombie. You are just talking to yourself.)
The question is: are you talking to yourself? You don't give an answer. You obviously have some investment in this conversation, or you wouldn't prompt me to respond.
As for me, I have a policy of not giving up on communication...at least so long as it seems feasible. Too many people give lip service to communication, and then throw it in the ditch at the slightest inconvenience. In your case, you are insincere. You want to make claims---but you don't want to provide sauce. You want to insult---but you refer to obscure personalities to do it. You are playing to the mirror. This all adds up to non-communication.
In this case, I am an expert in the area of physics, space flight, rocket propulsion, etc., and you are simply not familiar with the established history and science in this area. I don't say this to make it into a club. If you don't know about it, it would be like slapping you with a Kleenex. My point is that I can impart what I know if you are willing to set aside YOUR indoctrination and listen with attention.
As it is said, "the proof of the pudding is in the eating." We've been eating and proving the pudding (space flight) since 1957, and interplanetary travel (speaking broadly) since 1969. Entire industries are not built up---and making money---to play fake games.
Prove me wrong, as the saying goes. Since you don't know anything, there's nothing for you to enlighten me about. (And I don't know "Zuby" from a brain-eating zombie. You are just talking to yourself.)
If Im talking to myself then why do you continue to respond?
LOL.....
The question is: are you talking to yourself? You don't give an answer. You obviously have some investment in this conversation, or you wouldn't prompt me to respond.
As for me, I have a policy of not giving up on communication...at least so long as it seems feasible. Too many people give lip service to communication, and then throw it in the ditch at the slightest inconvenience. In your case, you are insincere. You want to make claims---but you don't want to provide sauce. You want to insult---but you refer to obscure personalities to do it. You are playing to the mirror. This all adds up to non-communication.
In this case, I am an expert in the area of physics, space flight, rocket propulsion, etc., and you are simply not familiar with the established history and science in this area. I don't say this to make it into a club. If you don't know about it, it would be like slapping you with a Kleenex. My point is that I can impart what I know if you are willing to set aside YOUR indoctrination and listen with attention.
As it is said, "the proof of the pudding is in the eating." We've been eating and proving the pudding (space flight) since 1957, and interplanetary travel (speaking broadly) since 1969. Entire industries are not built up---and making money---to play fake games.
Blah hahahahha.
Pal you can type a bunch of words but its just reads
BSBSBSBSBSBSBS
It is interesting how a person with an empty argument fills it with childish playground behavior. I think I am the adult part of this conversation.