So we know Q likes mind games and alluding to things. Think logical. So I got to thinking based on some information I have regarding certain...groups.
What I noticed is that there is a tendency in said groups to bypass restrictions on secrecy by asking tangential questions to the one you wish to divulge with. In this process the recipient of the question is expected to deduce logically what the truth is. This allows the sharer to shield themselves with "I didn't tell them. They figured it out" and the information gets shared. Personally, I think it's childish logic, but if that's how it's done in Rome, that's how it's done in Rome.
My point here is that Q operates almost EXACTLY the same way with many questions. It really triggered* my autism-level pattern recognition when I first noticed it. As a result, I think there's high chance that Q is at least in the orbit of such groups (assuming it's not a red herring).
What this means for my original point is that there are likely two tiers to this process. Obviously, if you share secrets through a Socratic method, your peers will eventually get mad, but maybe overlook it due to norms. However, if you share something truly sensitive, they're going to ding you anyways. Excuses be damned.
In other words, there are the things you can allude to, and the things you can absolutely never refer to. This is my theory.
So that end, I'm wondering if anyone has done a deep dive of things Q has explicitly avoided talking about or answering in situations where it seemed odd or out of place. We're ideally talking moments where Q would be talking in relation to a subject, a question may get asked, and Q either ignores it outright or deflects in some fashion (like not actually addressing it). These will be tells of something Q cannot talk about.
I know this will invite a lot of galactic-level weirdness, but we're mature enough to filter for that, right? We're looking at something more down-to-earth, less Alex Jones inter-dimensional demons and lizard people.
Think of it like "blind spots" in the Q narrative. What's hiding in the darkness? What was missed?
Important to note that Q could not violate the law by disclosing classified information. Instead, he posed the information in the form of a question. This provides legal cover. Hidden within many of these questions , once thoroughly investigated, would and does uncover many subject matters you might suggest were not mentioned. By example, even though not formed as a question, “watch the wives”
It's called "cooperative argument", also known as the Socratic method, or Socratic debate. It promotes critical thinking, often by asking the right questions.
My post kind of highlights exactly that but asks the inverse: what trail of logic was avoided by Q entirely?
If you start connecting all of the data points Q pointed out, one leads to another which leads to more and a "web" starts to appear if you represent this visually.
However, these aren't the only data points. My question here is if you follow that these areas he covered are "lit up" then what are the areas he avoided that he reasonably should have explored given the topic?
This could be seen as a "dark to light" sort of approach. "Think mirror" could be exactly that. Q itself was leading us in one direction, which was productive, but the other side of the coin was the real reveal.
Maybe this question was too esoteric, but I felt it was worth a shot.
In true Anon fashion... always leads us to this question we ask ourselves "WTF?" lok
There is a very obscure branch of Philosophy titled "Logic." Educating people on this topic is taboo to liberals and communists because all of their arguments are based on subjective emotion.
As light bearers and speakers of the truth, one must be careful to avoid championing subjective opinion.
Trying to find objective truth by deduction rarely leads to objective truth because the hypothesis formed is based on speculation
Deduction alone, sure. That's why you apply known truth to test the validity of it. Until it gets confirmed in a sufficient manner that's why it stays a hypothesis or theory. Without deduction you don't have science.
Without speculation and challenging of the accepted knowledge, you end up in a status quo. If you don't challenge inherited knowledge once in a while, you're vulnerable to historic lies.
The poison is in the amount and application method.
Q's response to the question about alien life was quite telling. I think that ETs figure BIGLY in whatever is coming.
u/#q2222
Assuming there are aliens, why haven't they been revealed already?
Option 1: Global panic based solely upon reveal. I don't really buy it these days, but maybe 100 years ago. With mass media we have whole generations conditioned to accept the possibility of alien life and all sorts of wacky forms of it from Star Trek to Rick and Morty. This isn't what's holding us back.
Option 2: We're not allowed to know by our "leaders." This is the more ominous option because Option 1 is reasonably ruled out. This leads into a whole realm of speculation itself, but I see the two branches here as either cooperative or adversarial between our top dogs and them. A hybrid of cooperation and adversarial would hilariously enough be akin to the movie Men In Black.
Option 3: The "X" factor or "wildcard" scenarios. For some reason the reveal of aliens to the masses will have an effect we publicly aren't aware of yet, but is deemed undesirable. This would make sense in a Lovecraftian scenario where such beings can ravage the minds of humanity with ease. We also cannot rule out these "aliens" are also religious in nature and such a reveal may trigger a significant event, but the classification as "alien" would be a misnomer in this scenario. Maybe the reveal puts our leadership in a bad light and now they're painted into a corner. Many exotic possibilities fall under this group.
Honestly, don't know. Don't particularly care until I know what it means in practical terms, but even as children we can comprehend the vastness of space and the likelihood it would spawn life other than ourselves. This particular topic actually interests me the least from Q.
or perhaps the aliens told the government not too.
I like your logic, here are a few that are not mentioned... most here already know these:
Adrenochrome
Khazarian
Reptilian
great question. perhaps anons can't think of anything just now but perhaps juices will flow in the future. one topic i think Q never discussed was 'black shelf tech' (apart from looking glass), stuff we have that would support the phrase 'the best is yet to come'. see post 2222 'highest classification'. also sallyj444's comment on Q's oft mentioned 'history books.
OK I’ve read your posts and the comments I have to say this is the stuff I come here for. Brilliant question - I can’t believe no one else has posted this before - and I hope this gets stickied. Well done, anon.
So I’m well aware that our history, not just the United States or even the Americas but world history is nothing like we think it is. Modern type technology has been found in many layers including hundreds of millions of years ago. We don’t know if there’s been multiple civilizations that got to this point and we’re either wiped out by asteroids or Siberian volcanos, or by their own hands, over and over through the millennia. This is something Q does not talk about, but does mention “history books” a lot. Q also never brought up reptiles, aliens other than alluding to the vastness of space indicating their do exist, No mention of Giants or nephilim. Falsified history, etc.
By the way, I am a Christian and believe in Jesus Christ. In no way does that mean that I can’t also believe aliens exist - for me that’s an easy one, God created everything, and everything in our universe and dimension is there to test, help, and teach us. i’m also open to reincarnation to come back here to this Universe/dimension training ground with its particular laws of physics unlike heaven (a real place in another dimension/diff laws of physics), and learn and relearn lessons that we can’t possibly learn in heaven.
A great site to get a picture of who we really are and where we come from is here: https://www.nderf.org/site_index.htm
Just start reading through the site indexes, the stories. It doesn’t matter what year you pick, just go all over the place he will get the general idea. Most important is that Jesus is real and Jesus is God.
another big topic i just thought of.... 'geo engineering' a deep state control method par excellance. see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mIT0sXq7VsY and https://weathermodificationhistory.com/president-lyndon-johnson-weather-wafare/
https://weathermodificationhistory.com/