"It is my understanding that the First Amendment provides no restrictions on what I'm allowed to question publicly or privately."
He literally doesn't have to say anything else.
"It is my understanding that the First Amendment provides no restrictions on what I'm allowed to question publicly or privately."
He literally doesn't have to say anything else.
I only responded to the first part because you said this, which is exactly what the trial shows, so there isn't really a need for me to explain anything beyond that. I understand where you are coming from though.