The things I write are considerate and reasonable. This is reasonable post and your response was retarded.
When I believe in something, I require some clear cut evidence. Something has to click and it has to be obvious and a stand out.
Deltas, "coincidences", time lines, people and comments. associations, money flow, these types of things.
And I need the same to bring forth to others because I want them to see it as well.
When the rebuttal to my evidence becomes as easy as "But he's just referencing a crowd or people or general gesture", I would feel like a retarded faggot trying to explain it's not because all I am left with is "but it looks like a Q".
The things I write are considerate and reasonable. This is reasonable post and your response was retarded.
When I believe in something, I require some clear cut evidence. Something has to click and it has to be obvious and a stand out.
Deltas, "coincidences", time lines, people and comments. associations, money flow, these types of things.
And I need the same to bring forth to others because I want them to see it as well.
When the rebuttal to my evidence becomes as easy as "But he's just referencing a crowd or people or general gesture", I would feel like a retarded faggot trying to explain it's not because all I am left with is "but it looks like a Q".
You see where I am going with this?
Why are you trying to convince people that Q exists by referencing Trump's hand signals? Seems like a bad approach.