https://jessica5b3.substack.com/p/the-bivalent-nightmare-begins-and

Of the 74 reports filed for first exposures, 10 (~13.5%) classified as severe, so far. Believe me, I am going to be keeping a close eye on this. But, to be clear, this really pisses me off. Most people who are being injected with this new ‘bivalent’ shot are doing so as a follow-up to previous shots! They are not only mixing products now but they are mixing types of injections! These things are NOT the same product as the previous ones (see saRNA article) and we, as data analysts, need the data to be remotely clean to determine whether or not the AEs being reported are due to the new products, or simply the by-product of damage already done by previous injections.

I just want to take a moment express how disgusted and appalled I am by the lack of structure and scientific integrity involved in everything associated with these COVID-19 injectable product roll-outs.

So let’s go deeper. I thought that the most pertinent information that I might be able to extract from this confounded data would be the reports filed for people who had this new bivalent product as a first shot. So of the 13.5% of the reports filed for these new products as first exposures to any COVID-19 injectable product, 6 filed myocarditis reports (8.1%).

One of these reports, one in particular caught my attention. VAERS ID #2443946 was made by a 24-year-old Californian girl, without previous medical issues - prior to this first injection with the new ‘bivalent’ products. This girl experienced heart trauma within 24 hours of injection and report . . .

Another report with VAERS ID #2428859 was filed for a 20-year-old from Washington who received this new crap as a second shot and ended up in the hospital with pericarditis.

I could keep going, but the point I want to make is this: even with this very early data, it is very easy to see that [sic, and removed in the headline text here] the clear danger signals - just as clearly as before.