Lesson on date fagging - September 24th passed without very much that was predicted actually happening - The Great Awakening

Lesson on date fagging - September 24th passed without very much that was predicted actually happening

posted 2 years ago by UnitedStatesPatriot 2 years ago by UnitedStatesPatriot +301 / -4

I've been following Q since about a month after they started posting and Im a VOAT refugee.

I could be wrong but did we have a lot of posts about September 24th being a very important day with yuge happenings? Unless I missed something, which is possible, I dont think it lived up to expectations.

One thing I've learned following Q so long is when you get hyped for specific dates be prepared to be disappointed. I recall a discussion (can't remeber if it was on GAW or VOAT) explaining how date fagging hurts norale and credibility of the Great Awakening/Q movement. I felt it and know that to be true.

When D5 was a flop I was really down and lost hope in the plan. It took some time for me to recover morale - I was really down. I dont want any of you to feel that level of disappointment so I wanted to share this PSA to be very careful with putting too much weight on info about specific dates.

191 comments

191 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (191)

sorted by:

▲ 11 ▼

– Make_CA_GreatAgain 11 points 2 years ago +11 / -0

The "ammunition expended" scenario. See something, say something.

Also,

Real events could be muted for operational security. It is logical that they would be.

The DS was compartmented. The groups can't/won't trust anyone outside their own compartments. It's a strong system for controlling information but a huge vulnerability if one group could potentially "have it all" (the map of their entire organization) they could address each compartment one by one, and none of the compartments would know the big picture was being changed, or how, or by whom.

Speculative.

permalink parent save report block reply