Edit: 2nd clip of Kash, talking about signing his book with WWG1WGA
This is worth listening to more than once I think. It strikes me as a marked change in the "official" position given on Q .... in some ways. I notice that Kash directly acknowledges Q as a person several times. I think what he means when he's saying "having fun" could be interpreted a variety of ways too. Ultimately though, his mention of connecting with Q via his 501c and "using it all for good" sounds similar to what Trump told Savannah Guthrie.... if the overall purposes and goals are the right ones, why worry about the small details...
Hmm... i need some help here guys. What say you all? How does it make you feel?
Thanks, Godspeed.
https://youtu.be/fwZ7Bc2_z0k
"The President never talks about the stuff the Q people talked about... numerology and gematrias."
Literally a few comments below yours? I mean you're right if you mean he never discusses the power of numbers and their hidden potential and meanings directly but do you expect him to do that, mate?
Christ sakes he says "good people" and they call him a Grand Dragon of the KKK, could you possibly imagine what they would do if he started saying obvious things about numerology and hidden messaging? They would impeach him or find a way to declare him mentally unfit for office if he uttered a peep like that once.
He certainly shows some aptitude for that if you check the video clip above, however. There are other numbers he's hung on like that before which also had meaning and a message that went along with them, too. Surely you know this?
As for Juan O Savin.... I don't know man, I've tried. It's the no face thing and the boots though man... he's been on shows and everywhere constantly for years, even doing live appearances... and he still does that gimmick, it strikes me as arrogant or something I guess.
It is made to seem like a precaution of some kind, as though he is implicitly telling us he's a high level target whose identity must be protected.
If that were true, I certainly hope he isn't walking around with fancy glasses of whiskey in his REAL house or driving around in HIS OWN TRUCK in areas near to where ** HE ACTUALLY LIVES** because if that's the case he's TOTALLY FOOKED and is probably having frequent shootouts and hostile encounters with all the damn assassins they are sending to his location that they would be able to whittle down to almost perfect accuracy.
I've listened before and I like some of what he has to say, if we just want to judge on content. He makes sense and provides a fairly good take on the logic the enemy is using and the counter moves made by the White Hats. He has a repore with Nino, who is sort of like the loose cannon guy so Juan gets to play it straight. It all feels well manicured and rehearsed, even the outburts of anger, and so that is what probably turned me off from continuing to check up on their show.
I only remember one example of him detailing specific things and that was in a convo with I think? Roseanne (yes THAT one) right after the 2020 election and he was saying big important things I do recall that much, however. I forget the specifics (which I think guys like Juan intentionally phrase things certain ways so you're MORE likely to forget, not often do they say outright "in 3 months the sting will go public and start rolling people up, you'll see it on TV) so I won't levy any critique of my own.
However I think he has something of a rep as a con job being that I've heard a lot of other Anons dismiss him as a grift. Also remember others saying he would keep giving near-term deadlines as to when "shit hits the fan" and every time a nothing-burger. I DO sort of remember a part of one where he's driving past some cows taking a shit (see? Embellishment you can get away with😉) and Nino is petulant, going "AGH Juan I stopped drinking and I just need to fuckin' PUNCH SHIT, MAN!! AGHH SOBRIETY MAKES ME SO VIOLENT JUANITO!! and Juan is all "Hold on my little Nino hang on mi sobrino it's coming soon, its not going to go much longer" it was real contrived.
But I don't know everyone has their preferred people to listen to. I still watch some Fox shows. Some guys like Bongino still. I am not hating on you at all for being a Juan O Savin proponent, just saying that we all need to be careful and take things we hear from basically anyone not named Q or Trump with a little salt & skepticism.
First of all you're right, you didn't ask for my opinion and I went right ahead giving, plenty of it too and unsolicited. So I apologize for that, my bad. I'm not sure why I felt the need but certainly I didn't mean to put you out at all, if I did.
Anyhow fren we just seem to be coming from really different places on Mr. 1-0-7. I admittedly have limited knowledge and a rather crude understanding of who he is and what he's involved in. You are confidently declaring he has a lot of clout around him and deservedly so, because he is the real deal and is held in highest esteem by other Patriots I am more familiar with.
I have never heard anyone that you named or similar types involved with Trump talk about Juan at all so I don't know. You might be right, I'm sure you wouldn't have said so otherwise.
The other thing going on is I didn't know anything about him having expertise with numerology and gematria. It seems like you're saying he actually advises the President's circle on it or that he did help to educate them. I've not seen enough of him I guess, nor have I heard him do numerology breakdowns before. If I had I'd certainly have been more interested in him, I'm no expert myself but I have a pretty keen interest in those who are and can show something of value with it.
It's a little bit the same as Robert Barnes. I know more about the camps of people who have opposite opinions of the guy than I do about the actual person. I've heard good and bad but never went on a dig to figure out what I think about him personally.
So, because of this and what you've said I'm going to check out Mr. Savin. If it is like you say and he's got interesting stuff to offer that has crossover with Q research, maybe I can write up something and try to help get the GAW community educated on him and where he might help fill in some knowledge gaps, etc etc.
No pressure but do you have anything to share? Links of some good sauce? Good place to start? Let me know if you do thanks.
Dude I sincerely appreciate the time you've taken to craft out this answer. I need to start fresh and read it from the top in order to make sense of it. I have a SubStack and I think it might be cool to take what you've written here and go section by section and write my responses underneath in a different font or color. So as not to get lost and also to be able to cross-platform and get it out elsewhere. You've built a little castle here and I would like to see you get credit for it if you care. Hah.
Kash definitely slipped in the truth of Q in that first video
"Whatever the movement is saying, matters to a lot of people, and you gotta take it seriously and move these people into the tent"
"We take the proceeds and drive it toward the mission"
"If you're not gonna have fun with it and can't get people to relate to it, you're not gonna have an effective...messaging....scheme."
"And I think, Donald Trump, better than anyone else, knows how to message"
Do the math. He's telling you right here Q is Trump.
Boom. That right there is EXACTLY what I needed thank you for playing that back and framing it up in text the way you did. Totally rings true.
You nailed it he is at the least connecting the two, but it certainly is getting closer to outright saying Q is Trump in an outright manner.
Trump certainly likes to "have fun." All the clown names for his enemies etc. Messaging, check. Thinking back to all those zero deltas, original image posts, "Kash Patel" a name to remember. Hell, even when Q was "wrong" about certain stuff "Trust Wray" "Trust Sessions" (just for example) wouldn't that sorta have mirrored what Trump was thinking at the time?
Then you've got tonight's ReTruths. This is certainly getting very interesting. It has the feel of the Epstein thread, like we're leading up to a similar, seemingly impossible crazy reveal that will shake the foundations and leave the media stunned.
Godspeed.
Good catch on connecting the dot with the "having fun" aspect of this.
It's funny when people say some Q proofs are "wrong" or "hadn't come true". They're implying we know the plan and that it's all over. It's so ridiculous. We've been told 80% of the goings on is behind the scenes and may remain there forever.
President Trump has to keep those Liberals wondering what type of organization is Q and what is Q doing? It probably scares the Hell out of them. That's what I call, Trump having fun with it.
Yes, I'd definitely say so. He's got that sarcastic yet charming way of explaining what their pea brains come up with before dismantling it with facts and logic.
His humor and candor is the major factor in what set him apart and made him so endeared by the people. Those are certainly also qualities we see in Q. The "tricky" way he leaves messages within messages, comms linking one to the other and so forth.
Q and Trump both share a dark sobriety regarding the crimes committed and potential future envisioned for America by the Hellspawn, but they have an equally dark sense of humor when regarding their failures and exposure to the world writ large, is what I'd say.
Furthermore they both focus on the media/internet (social & tech co's) as the chief tool needed for them to continue their activities unabated.
If you take to the idea that Trump was the clarion call against the "fake news" in the medium of television, Q is his equal, heading up the rallying cry against disinfo/censorship on the Internet (actually predicting its wider use in advance) and they are two halves of the same whole. Both are "insiders" dedicated to exposing the truth in a simple way and showing that truth, simply stated in public forum, will go around any amount of expensive lies and have incredible staying power. What I like also about the side-by-side comparison is that each is able to be a touchstone for different age groups, respectively: one thing I think the media monsters truly fear about Q is that it plays to a younger age group, who they've always sought to control. Young people turning away and deprogramming themselves from their brainwashing is the death of their lies.
Amen. Love the last line.
The way the guy explains the 'air Q' is hilarious, too! I also just like people who have really annoying monotone voices. Kek
https://youtu.be/fwZ7Bc2_z0k
Excellent video thank you for sharing it with us. I especially like 9,13,17 thing. Never heard that one! But I've only been seriously onto Q for a year or so really.
Just an aside, I think it's been funny to watch the process of Patel Patriot (Devolution author) getting into Q. He's well on his way now but he really resisted in the beginning, until it was clear there was just no way not to acknowledge the connections between what he was putting forward from his direct research and the Q posts.
I think him in particular getting on-board is such great reinforcement for normies who have resisted or denied it at all costs and even when it was obvious. Now there is another way to check the proofs and even if you still don't like it, the message checks out correctly. Signal not noise.