Edit: 2nd clip of Kash, talking about signing his book with WWG1WGA
This is worth listening to more than once I think. It strikes me as a marked change in the "official" position given on Q .... in some ways. I notice that Kash directly acknowledges Q as a person several times. I think what he means when he's saying "having fun" could be interpreted a variety of ways too. Ultimately though, his mention of connecting with Q via his 501c and "using it all for good" sounds similar to what Trump told Savannah Guthrie.... if the overall purposes and goals are the right ones, why worry about the small details...
Hmm... i need some help here guys. What say you all? How does it make you feel?
Thanks, Godspeed.
First of all you're right, you didn't ask for my opinion and I went right ahead giving, plenty of it too and unsolicited. So I apologize for that, my bad. I'm not sure why I felt the need but certainly I didn't mean to put you out at all, if I did.
Anyhow fren we just seem to be coming from really different places on Mr. 1-0-7. I admittedly have limited knowledge and a rather crude understanding of who he is and what he's involved in. You are confidently declaring he has a lot of clout around him and deservedly so, because he is the real deal and is held in highest esteem by other Patriots I am more familiar with.
I have never heard anyone that you named or similar types involved with Trump talk about Juan at all so I don't know. You might be right, I'm sure you wouldn't have said so otherwise.
The other thing going on is I didn't know anything about him having expertise with numerology and gematria. It seems like you're saying he actually advises the President's circle on it or that he did help to educate them. I've not seen enough of him I guess, nor have I heard him do numerology breakdowns before. If I had I'd certainly have been more interested in him, I'm no expert myself but I have a pretty keen interest in those who are and can show something of value with it.
It's a little bit the same as Robert Barnes. I know more about the camps of people who have opposite opinions of the guy than I do about the actual person. I've heard good and bad but never went on a dig to figure out what I think about him personally.
So, because of this and what you've said I'm going to check out Mr. Savin. If it is like you say and he's got interesting stuff to offer that has crossover with Q research, maybe I can write up something and try to help get the GAW community educated on him and where he might help fill in some knowledge gaps, etc etc.
No pressure but do you have anything to share? Links of some good sauce? Good place to start? Let me know if you do thanks.
Dude I sincerely appreciate the time you've taken to craft out this answer. I need to start fresh and read it from the top in order to make sense of it. I have a SubStack and I think it might be cool to take what you've written here and go section by section and write my responses underneath in a different font or color. So as not to get lost and also to be able to cross-platform and get it out elsewhere. You've built a little castle here and I would like to see you get credit for it if you care. Hah.