Yes, these kinds of photos are considered "war trophies". There's no good reason to take war trophies. The locals see a uniform posing next to their dead kin, and they see it as murder tourism, not as war or "security". It leads to revenge attacks on someone wearing the same uniform somewhere else in the theater. The punishment can be severe case by case if the offense is more egregious.
Also notice that not a single one was disciplined over those pictures.
Meanwhile, there have been soldiers that have been harshly disciplined for taking pictures of or posing with dead terrorists while fighting in the ME.
Yes, these kinds of photos are considered "war trophies". There's no good reason to take war trophies. The locals see a uniform posing next to their dead kin, and they see it as murder tourism, not as war or "security". It leads to revenge attacks on someone wearing the same uniform somewhere else in the theater. The punishment can be severe case by case if the offense is more egregious.
So why were these FBI agents not deal with in the same manner?
If military tribunals are to happen, they will be.
Or
If military tribunals do not happen, they will incur potential revenge attacks on the uniform.