Critical Thinking addendum: Remember to discuss/argue/debate in the higher ranges (Graham's Hierarchy)
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (35)
sorted by:
But if the person is stuck in cognitive dissonance beyond repair, combining the entire pyramid is totally fair.
Don't believe me? Watch how 45 does it.
That's true, but the problem is those low levels waste massive amounts of time and energy for little return on investment. Sure, trolling is fun, and it's ok to play with it in small calculated doses for comedic value, memes, or to get the other party to expose. But this is more of a guide to help in discussion to identify the low-energy zone, and stay out of it, or use it to your advantage.
It also wastes massive amounts of their time and energy.
Which even if you cheese your way through victory (Capcom term) the last blow will still mean you win, which if you follow up with the green area afterwards, they accept on a small level because you've beaten the animal brain.
Source: Arguing with jews, hood rats, cult members, and stubborn people with too much money.
true too, and you can learn a lot, even build a good foundation doing that. But through the more you learn, eventually the time comes where the need to focus on higher concepts becomes the greater desire :)
And once you pass that stage, you will learn that the higher concepts can only apply to people who are willing to use them.
Sun Tzu
Not every debate stage relies on academia, which is why a synthesis will ultimately prevail. POTUS shows the way.
Choosing either side is like bringing a sword to a gunfight.