A good few have suggested that Q might be a supercomputer; that Q stands for Quantum.
I find that hard to believe...
Not because I think it's impossible, but because I think it is redundant.
What did Q really need from Anons? If Patriots were in control, 100%, then why mess around with some shitposters on the Chans?
Here's my theory.
In the good old days, before the internet, if you had a question you had two options: find it in a book or ask someone in town.
I can wax poetically about what wondrous adventures that would result in, but that's a topic for another time.
For now, let's admire what really occurred when a Question demanded an Answer.
You would hunt around, and ask for the experience of others for the solution. For topics your mind couldn't possibly bother remembering, specialists existed who dealt with the matter every day of their lives.
You would have wise men, shamans, and artisans you could go to for their first hand experience on how to proceed in your endeavors. Sharing your experience and dreams with them while you move around the world.
This has all been disrupted with the Internet, but especially by Search Engines like Google.
You see, that's the primary goal of Google -- to stop us from interacting with one another, as Movers in the world who share our experiences, and instead promote a singular narrative void of personal experience and backed by only the all-knowing "Algorithm."
So, what are we to do when that Algorithm turns on the host? Offers up malicious and biased information for the sole purpose of controlling the masses? How can we possibly revive an out-dated system of asking questions to actual people and not heavily manipulated strings of code in today's modern environment?
Q
Do you see why Anons are so important?
We are the Information Branch of the COIN Intel Operation. We not only disseminate knowledge to the normies, but we also provide an invaluable service to Q and Patriot White hats behind the scenes.
We are the White Hat Google -- the only source of information that is scrupulous enough to sift through the propaganda and narrative spin cycle to arrive at likely hypotheses, at the very least.
When Q asks us a question, it doesn't necessarily mean Q already knows the answer. Instead, the questions Q asks that Q does know the answers to are training data for us to temper our edge. Q puts us through training exercises with the Q drop questions and every now and then Q asks us a question Patriots don't know the answer to.
We then jump into gear and provide an array of possible answers using our Autist super powers.
Take note: Anons are the best source of authentic information gathering the World of Man can possibly muster...
Furthermore, we offer a utility in that we can act as a litmus test for certain narrative drives. Think of us all as a test bed for some of the White Hats more nebulous ideas. If Patriots aren't sure how some information will be received by normies, they ask Anons first to see if it goes over. Things like UFOs, or JFK. Things like Coded Language and Occult Symbolism.
If WE can't handle it, then the narrative push definitely needs more time in the oven for normies to warm up to it.
Q really seems to have stopped posting reliably, but that by no means suggests that Q operatives aren't here on this board, or any other; testing narratives, pushing stories we may have missed, and combatting shills and malicious DeepState players trying to screw with us.
Sites like GAW are battlefields. PDW is especially hectic, having factions of "Hitler did nothing wrong" fags battling out with "the earth is flat" folks.
But, by the nature of anonymous posting, the dotWins is a place that is necessary to exist for both sides to have any control over the most astute of us. Left to our own devices, there's no telling which side might end up on top. We are a wild card; an unknown quantity that has to be worked around in every plan.
So... What I'm trying to say is this:
We are the news now. We are the body of free-thinkers which provides answers to questions in a sea of misinformation. We are the hard-working gears and circuits in the machine that grind away to give accurate assessments on the emotional state of the Nation -- for good or for ill. We are a resource that has to be maintained lest it fall into the hands of the enemy. Like a bridge that both sides are stuck fighting over. If the bridge blows up, then the fight can't go on.
It's not a true peace when both sides are still snapping at each other like dogs on either side of an iron gate.
Anons and boards like these have to be tolerated and fought over. We are the front line of the digital battlefield. For Q and Patriots to know which way the wind is blowing, it's certain that they are here among us taking calculated shots across no-man's-land, creating openings in strategic places as best they can without their cover being blown.
In my opinion, this is one of the major facets behind the Q operation -- to provide real-time intelligence to operatives as it pertains to the overarching narrative in this war, whether they just have questions that need answering outside the Google power structure, or need to test a select population which is most likely to positively accept a crazy theory here and there.
That's my theory anyways...
Great post! And it proves your point by introducing an idea I haven't seen anyone describe here in exactly this way -- that we anons are an intelligence resource for Q (and for each other), and not just as a tool to help wake up normies. I hadn't even thought of your point that when Q asks a question, it might sometimes actually be that Q is hoping to get an answer in response.
I'll add a relevant note: Some believe (see Erik J. Larson's The Myth of Artificial Intelligence; why computers can't think the way we do) that (for one thing) computers aren't capable of induction in the manner humans are, because "induction means acquiring knowledge from experience" -- and computers don't spend time in the real world with humans, gaining the experience and knowledge we get just from living our lives. That is one reason computers so often miss "the obvious" because, without a lived life -- a life lived in the human world -- no amount of computing power can replace the common sense, often unnoticed knowledge that humans pick up constantly.
Because we are the ones breaking the news.