No, I want forensic evidence. A repeatable experiment where the conclusion is clear and can stand up to scrutiny.
"feelings" are not reality. This is way too close to calling people witches and burning innocent people for a feeling. You need real evedence.
I want evidence, not loose, weak theories based on conjecture and feelings.
1&2. prove the third eye is real.
Lol.. so to prove reptilians are real I have to first speak and resonate with reptilians? Where is the logic in that. It's like saying if you want proof Santa is real first you have to believe he is real with all your heart.
your experiment fails basic premises of the scientific method.
Prove that they can read minds and send messages. Prove that what you "hear" is not your own thoughts.
Coincidence, or thinking the same thought can exist wothout a reptilian pushing images into your mind, this doesn't prove a reptilian exists.
so you think that if I don't go along with an obviously flawed experiment then I must be manipulated or emotional?
the burden of proof is on the person making the claim YOU. which means that it's your burden to prove it, not my burden to prove it or disprove it.
I am keeping an open mind, it can be real, I won't however accept it as reality wothout evidence that it is reality.
you seem to accept things as reality without objective evidence which is handy to the DeepState who inject forums with disinformation and theories based solely to manipulate people like you who fall for it.
Anything is possible, but it's not probable. You had subjective experience. Not objective.learn the difference. You experienced it, you are the subject. I cannot take a tool, and experience what you did each and every time I use such a tool. I cannot then have someone else pick up a physical tool, and have them use it to see a reptilian. Or experience the same thing I did.
I don't want just any "proof" I want forensic evidence, proof that can withstand scrutiny. You seem to be unable to provide anything like that. This sounds more and more like a delusion and less like it's based in reality the more the conversation goes on.
A microscope is a tool for objective measurement of reality. It's not the same since you are asking me to follow something the is not objective reality. If you tell me I can see reptilians using a microscope or any other objective device I would but instead you want me to use subjective tools.
Here are examples I would accept as reptilians outside of physically see one.
DNA evidence
historical evidence like bones and culture of these reptilians.
basically anything physically and directly attributed to a reptilian and noone else.
if you had a peer reviewed study showing they were real I would not write it off, I would review the study and see if the srudy was experimental or nonexperimental, I will also check to see what logic was used and how it was measured.
you had an experience, you believe it was real. I get that but that's not evidence. Just as an insane person who thinks that they can fly and belive it fully, doesnt mean that's reality. In the end you need a physically method to test in order to prove it to be reality without that, there will always be a high probability of it being delusion.
again your analogy of you giving me a microscope is a poor analogy since you want me to measure something subjective not objective.
if someone believes something, even if everyone but someone believes something it doesn't mean it's true or reality. Let's flip it, you see that most people don't believe what you believe, you should understand that just because we don't believe it, doesnt mean it's not true right? So believe isn't evidence.
regardless of tools, is there anything, anything at all that is physically in this reality that can me measured which shows the existence of reptilians? Or is it strictly, mental, non-physical/spiritual?
I'm not going to try methods without proof. Just as I wont get a covid vax without proof of it working and not causing harm. You are asking me to take the shot to see if it works, but there is no objective proof that you are providing that it does.
Anything is possible, but it's not probable. You had subjective experience. Not objective.learn the difference. You experienced it, you are the subject. I cannot take a tool, and experience what you did each and every time I use such a tool. I cannot then have someone else pick up a physical tool, and have them use it to see a reptilian. Or experience the same thing I did.
I don't want just any "proof" I want forensic evidence, proof that can withstand scrutiny. You seem to be unable to provide anything like that. This sounds more and more like a delusion and less like it's based in reality the more the conversation goes on.
A microscope is a tool for objective measurement of reality. It's not the same since you are asking me to follow something the is not objective reality. If you tell me I can see reptilians using a microscope or any other objective device I would but instead you want me to use subjective tools.
Here are examples I would accept as reptilians outside of physically see one.
I'm not going to try methods without proof. Just as I wont get a covid vax without proof of it working and not causing harm. You are asking me to take the shot to see if it works, but there is no objective proof that you are providing that it does.
That would not be objective thats subjective.