Maybe, just maybe, Q said that the moon landing were real, the earth is round, and JFK Jr is dead… because these things are true.
“But muh disinfo necessary!”
If you’re going to invoke that line to accuse Q of lying when it’s convenient, then why should we believe anything he says? If you’re going to believe what Q says, you’re going to have to take his word at face value unless there’s evidence to suggest otherwise.
Q himself said disinformation is necessary. We don't take anything on faith alone.
And unfortunately the evidence is beyond any shadow of a doubt that the apollo missions, at least the footage that was shown to the public, are obvious hoaxes.
Q did say that disinfo was necessary, but that does not mean you can arbitrarily apply this to other things he said. If you’re going to assert that Q said X when he “really meant” the opposite, then you’re going to have to provide evidence. And unfortunately, the “evidence” that the moon landing was faked or that the earth is flat is far from conclusive. I’ve argued with these types for years, and their arguments boil down to 3 main categories:
(Insert aspect of science or space travel here) doesn’t make sense to me. I don’t understand it, therefore the whole thing’s a hoax.
The government disagrees with me, therefore I’m right.
I cherry picked some space related data to make 666 pop up every once in a while, therefore NASA consists of satanic Freemasons who lie about everything.
So yes, we are going to disagree because moon landing deniers and flat earthers aren’t interested in truth, facts, or reason. They want their pet theory to be true regardless of evidence because they have a persecution complex. They love other people telling them they’re wrong because it cements in their minds even more that they’re right.
Maybe, just maybe, Q said that the moon landing were real, the earth is round, and JFK Jr is dead… because these things are true.
“But muh disinfo necessary!”
If you’re going to invoke that line to accuse Q of lying when it’s convenient, then why should we believe anything he says? If you’re going to believe what Q says, you’re going to have to take his word at face value unless there’s evidence to suggest otherwise.
Q himself said disinformation is necessary. We don't take anything on faith alone.
And unfortunately the evidence is beyond any shadow of a doubt that the apollo missions, at least the footage that was shown to the public, are obvious hoaxes.
We will not agree on this topic.
Q did say that disinfo was necessary, but that does not mean you can arbitrarily apply this to other things he said. If you’re going to assert that Q said X when he “really meant” the opposite, then you’re going to have to provide evidence. And unfortunately, the “evidence” that the moon landing was faked or that the earth is flat is far from conclusive. I’ve argued with these types for years, and their arguments boil down to 3 main categories:
(Insert aspect of science or space travel here) doesn’t make sense to me. I don’t understand it, therefore the whole thing’s a hoax.
The government disagrees with me, therefore I’m right.
I cherry picked some space related data to make 666 pop up every once in a while, therefore NASA consists of satanic Freemasons who lie about everything.
So yes, we are going to disagree because moon landing deniers and flat earthers aren’t interested in truth, facts, or reason. They want their pet theory to be true regardless of evidence because they have a persecution complex. They love other people telling them they’re wrong because it cements in their minds even more that they’re right.