People have been discussing the "10 day" event and the "scare" event theorizing that it may be linked to nuclear event from NATO/ Ukraine/ Russia. What if the event is actually linked to our access to money?
Many of the financial systems around the world are interconnected through investments. All it takes is for one of them to go down all the rest will follow shortly after. Banks will close down, ATM's will be turned off, access to your cash will be placed on a temporary hold.
We know Biden is destroying our currency, the stock market is taking massive hits, we have the China real estate crisis, European financial system is going down fast. Cutting energy delivery to Europe will hasten this collapse. European industry will be forced to shut down.
If a lack of access to cash turned in to a worldwide scenario, I think it would be more of a scare event than Russia bombing a target in Ukraine.
The current financial system needs to be destroyed. The Federal Reserve, international banking system, IMF and Tri-City establishment needs to go bye bye. Totally destroying the financial system we have in place today is the only way to get rid of it.
The 10 day event and scare event will most likely happen simultaneously. Stopping all access to the banking industry, pausing society as a whole, cutting communications, interrupting internet. Whole world comes to a stop. People will think the sky is falling.
Be prepared, we don't know when it will happen. If I had to guess, soon. Have everything you need to live for a couple weeks. Stock up, have cash tucked away, keep your gas tanks full. It is better to be prepared and not need it than vice versa.
Stay safe my frens
WWG1WGA!!!
When Q said “scare event”, he also said “non-nuclear”, so this theory makes more sense. At the same time, it does seem like a narrative is being built where Biden brings the world to a state of imminent nuclear war through incompetence and corruption, and then President Trump swoops in (with help from the military?) to negotiate a worldwide peace deal and the end of the nuclear war threat. If this narrative has been in the works for a few years now, then I think the Hawaii nuclear alert would have been a social experiment to see how it affected people. If everyone had freaked out and started raping and shooting each other, Q Team probably would have had to rethink this plan.
I also think Covid might have been the “scare event”. Basically it was biological warfare, but at the most minimal level imaginable. That seemed very White Hat to me, like, “OK, we have to do this, but what would be the LEAST upsetting biological attack?” And they arrived at “the common cold”. That seems like the rationalization people would make to justify faking a biological attack on the entire world. Also, I often think major military actions went down during that initial lockdown when the streets everywhere were empty. It would make sense to me that even as they were faking the common cold as biological warfare, they could have been genuinely worried about real biological warfare and needed people off the streets until the enemy was subdued.
It's the vaccine I'm worried about.
It’s possible the White Hats allowed the vaccine to be poisoned to break the pharmaceutical spell of vaccines. Remember that it was only a few years ago when being slandered as an “anti-vaxxer” was common on the left and the right, at every economic level, and at every social class. It was like being called a “Holocaust denier”. Probably there are people here who now know the truth who used to be absolutely cruel to “anti-vaxxers” and spread much slander and hate about those who didn’t inject themselves with the latest pharmaceutical products.
This has now changed. People on the left are still clinging on to the “anti-vaxxer” slur, but that’s about it. The magic spell around vaccines has been broken. Could this be “the hardest decision of his life” that Trump had to make? To knowingly allow a poisoned vaccine which would kill millions in order to break the vaccine industry, which was killing tens of millions?
And you can’t just say: well, Trump could have just gone in front of a camera and told the truth about vaccines. Because one thing Trump showed us, along with Q, is that you cannot wake up people who actively choose to stay asleep. Hydroxychloroquine is a perfect example of this. Trump mentioned that a nearly-inert common drug with a 50-year track record could reduce Covid symptoms, and what did you see? You saw the entire world turn on him, you saw scientists forge peer-reviewed studies in the Lancet, you saw a worldwide ban on the drug, you saw doctors who had safely been prescribing it for decades suddenly turn around and call it a toxic poison, you saw prescriptions cancelled, you saw Neil Cavuto in his whiny bitch-voice screaming into a camera, “Hydroxychloroquine will KILL you!”
And if that is what the world does when they hear something they don’t like, that alleviates their fear, think about how they would react to the truth about vaccines?
How, then, do you even begin to change that programmed response? Because it’s not as easy as “just tell the truth”.
I do still hope the “vaccine” (mRNA injection) has some sort of antidote that the White Hats are sitting on. That might better explain how they let this happen, knowing that more people would be saved by waking them up to the vaccine, and that those who didn’t die from it immediately could later be saved from it. And then I guess those who took it but died before the antidote was released would have been seen as the inevitable casualties of information warfare.
Yeah, still worries me. My wife had to get it to keep her profession.
I also think a lot of the injections were saline - possibly the majority. I know so many people who took it and appear to be unaffected so that gives me hope that there was tons and tons of saline administered instead of the mRNA fluid-tech. This would also explain why everyone caught Covid anyways. Good luck!