That would be rational if the title was not misleading.
if for example, MSM has an article like "trump supports white supremacists by calling them good people" (remember that?) and I wanted to point out on the site that what he was actually saying was not what the title of the article is trying to lead people to believe, would you then tell me that I shouldn't care about the title and instead just talk about the content of the article? I hope not. People tend to not read into the content nearly as much as what the title says, so it's important to clarify to people when the title is misleading or when an image is doctored, or when a quote is taken out of context regardless of which side this is supporting or damaging. We are on the side of objective truth.
That would be rational if the title was not misleading. if for example, MSM has an article like "trump supports white supremacists by calling them good people" (remember that?) and I wanted to point out on the site that what he was actually saying was not what the title of the article is trying to lead people to believe, would you then tell me that I shouldn't care about the title and instead just talk about the content of the article? I hope not. People tend to not read into the content nearly as much as what the title says, so it's important to clarify to people when the title is misleading or when an image is doctored, or when a quote is taken out of context regardless of which side this is supporting or damaging. We are on the side of objective truth.