let's back up a bit and address your lack of knowledge how civics work in the US.

This should be fun

The president doesn't have the power to point at someone and say "you're going to jail". You understand that, right?

Never said POTUS has the unilateral power to throw anyone in jail. Granted, during time of war (which we've been in a state of war since Sept 14, 2001) POTUS has quite broad war powers and can actually order the arrest of virtually anyone so long as there is probable cause on suspicion of terrorism. Even during time of peace, POTUS is responsible for directing the DOJ to prosecute. Did Trump order investigations? Sure. And yet here we still are. You understand that you keep missing the point, right? Trump got at least half the country to seriously believe that he'd put Hillary in jail. That's what a politician does. Again, Miracles for Sale. Brilliant performance by an actor playing the role of politician (who ironically and fittingly sold the shtick of not being a politician)

You understand how, if Trump actually did that, it would be a bad thing? Did you actually want a banana republic president who jailed political opponents without due process?

See above regarding actual constitutional powers. Also, never said "jailed without due process." Have to hand it to you, the sophistry is top level.

Trump saying Hillary should be put in jail is not the same as Trump promising to put her in jail.

"If I was President, you'd be in jail." The implication is as clear as can be, with an if-then conditional statement. His audience heard and interpreted exactly what he (and others) wanted. The response (Lock Her Up) demonstrated that brilliance. Far more effective than political campaign battle cries like Yes We Can, Hope and Change, Tippecanoe and Tyler Too, and Fifty-Four Forty or Fight... this was "waving the bloody shirt" on steroids. Again. Political brilliance, especially comebined with MAGA and Save America.

she should be locked up without due process

Never said that.

The only one unconcerned with due process here appears to be you.

Bearing false witness ain't cool my dude

Insisting Q isn't provable isn't a valid point.

Never said "Q isn't provable". And what do you even mean by that? Q as in, a person or group? A plan, a la the Q Plan? Prophecies or predictions? What is "Q" to be proved? What happened to words mean things?

Of course it's not provable, that is by design.

So "it" (whatever "it" is, that you've failed to define) is or isn't? You attack a alleged claim never made, that it isn't, as being invalid, and follow it up with an assertion that it isn't actual provable but copout with "that's by design." Brilliant.

I really couldn't care less if you believe Q is real or whether Trump is Q+

You seem to care. Quite a lot, in fact...

This is, however, a Q board.

Well, more specifically it's the Great Awakening board, of which Q posts are discussed with the assumption of legitimacy.

The least you could do is not act surprised that people here believe Q, or think that Trump is Q+.

I'm acting surprised by thoughts that I myself, on countless occasions, have discussed in the affirmative?

If that hasn't been proven to your satisfaction, then it's of no concern to me.

You seem quite concerned, given your extensive engagement of my comments.

Bringing us back to the most important question here: do you know you're an ad? 🤔