The yearly flu vaccine probably was a lower rate of death over a longer period of time. But since people weren't going in for their annual flu injections they were not obtaining the X amount of deaths they were hoping for say over 2 decades.
So they decided to accelerate their time table with the current poison jabs. In fact they encourage people to inject themselves with the flu AND corona poison jabs. Which to me means that these people are increasingly less likely to receive both placebos by taking these jabs based on these odds. Same with the mixing and matching of different poison jabs like moderna and pfizer. Absurd.
True. I think the Rockefeller-developed medical industry may have been corrupt from the beginning, since the Rockefellers certainly were. I could never take a flu shot. The way they were pushed on us was completely creepy.
The Tom Longouo interview on SGT Report that I watched today talked about how it used to be Agenda 2050 but got moved up to 2030, supposing that the Cabal realized they were running low on time and people were waking up too fast.
2030 talk focused on global warming crisis which ramped up in the late 90s and the year 2000. At the same time during 1997-2001 period talk ramped up about 2050 global water crisis. During that same time period we had a lot of PR spin about the good of globalization as it was a full court press.
The talk of rising sea levels and melting of artic caps ramped up from 1999-2001. The projections they made was 2020 was the pivotal point. Why choose 2020 of all dates? We didn't know then but we now know why....
Even looking back at charts of sea level rise then and now 2020 isn't a significant enough of an increase to circle on a calendar as a pivotal point. Plus, the reason why a lot of people are more skeptical of global warming claims now is because Gore did a full court press about 2020 being the breaking point for humanity regarding global warming.
The water crisis of 2050 was supposed to be caused by global warming which would fuel more wars and famines. But that doesn't make sense if they are pushing globalization. Globalization is supposed to level the playing field and provide resources to poorer least developed countries from the major developed countries. So how is it possible that wars are going to break out over water all because of global warming? They tried to argue the war in Syria was a result of people not having enough fresh water as the tipping point.
Also global warming from a geological earth history perspective always leads to increase precipitations for most of the globe anyways. That is how you can arrive to an ice age. And ice age can not occur without increased precipitation which sequesters the water as ice and away from the hydrological cycle.
The yearly flu vaccine probably was a lower rate of death over a longer period of time. But since people weren't going in for their annual flu injections they were not obtaining the X amount of deaths they were hoping for say over 2 decades.
So they decided to accelerate their time table with the current poison jabs. In fact they encourage people to inject themselves with the flu AND corona poison jabs. Which to me means that these people are increasingly less likely to receive both placebos by taking these jabs based on these odds. Same with the mixing and matching of different poison jabs like moderna and pfizer. Absurd.
True. I think the Rockefeller-developed medical industry may have been corrupt from the beginning, since the Rockefellers certainly were. I could never take a flu shot. The way they were pushed on us was completely creepy.
The Tom Longouo interview on SGT Report that I watched today talked about how it used to be Agenda 2050 but got moved up to 2030, supposing that the Cabal realized they were running low on time and people were waking up too fast.
2030 talk focused on global warming crisis which ramped up in the late 90s and the year 2000. At the same time during 1997-2001 period talk ramped up about 2050 global water crisis. During that same time period we had a lot of PR spin about the good of globalization as it was a full court press.
The talk of rising sea levels and melting of artic caps ramped up from 1999-2001. The projections they made was 2020 was the pivotal point. Why choose 2020 of all dates? We didn't know then but we now know why....
Even looking back at charts of sea level rise then and now 2020 isn't a significant enough of an increase to circle on a calendar as a pivotal point. Plus, the reason why a lot of people are more skeptical of global warming claims now is because Gore did a full court press about 2020 being the breaking point for humanity regarding global warming.
The water crisis of 2050 was supposed to be caused by global warming which would fuel more wars and famines. But that doesn't make sense if they are pushing globalization. Globalization is supposed to level the playing field and provide resources to poorer least developed countries from the major developed countries. So how is it possible that wars are going to break out over water all because of global warming? They tried to argue the war in Syria was a result of people not having enough fresh water as the tipping point.
Also global warming from a geological earth history perspective always leads to increase precipitations for most of the globe anyways. That is how you can arrive to an ice age. And ice age can not occur without increased precipitation which sequesters the water as ice and away from the hydrological cycle.