A simple explanation of how "The Scientific Method" has changed from Then to Now....
(media.greatawakening.win)
💊 TRUTH PILL 💊
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (22)
sorted by:
Thank you. However, you say this all comes from a "pre-isolated virus". That is not what I need to see. I need to see that such an object is proven to be causing and spreading sickness in the wild by observing such an object being taken from a sick person and only said object being transferred to another person and then the other person becoming sick with the same symptoms. Then a sample taken from the newly sick person should be shown to contain an amount of the same object that was originally identified.
If this is done with multiple volunteers with various different backgrounds etc. then I can be reasonably sure that this object is what is causing the sickness and not something else that hasn't been observed yet.
So far the only research similar to this that I have found failed. Miserably.
I see what you're asking. As I mentioned, I have never, nor has anyone I know, ever deliberately infected anyone. I can, however, share this bit of information from when I worked on a project tracking Hepatitis C virus quasispecies transmission through the population. Hepatitis C has a high rate of mutation. Every time it replicates, there is a high likelihood that it will pick up a small alteration in its genetic sequence. The group of disparate HepC viruses as a whole with their variances is called quasispecies. When we would sequence and examine the virus isolated from sick patients we would know precisely who infected whom. If the virus was identical between two infected people we knew they were closely involved and if the virus was very different we knew the two people were not involved in the same chain of transmission. The patient record regarding personal history and reported contacts would corroborate our findings.